Letter to Editor in response to "Acute kidney injury in 18 cats after subcutaneous meloxicam and an update on non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drug usage in feline patients in Australia"
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Australian Veterinary JournalEarly View LETTER TO THE EDITOR Letter to Editor in response to "Acute kidney injury in 18 cats after subcutaneous meloxicam and an update on non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug usage in feline patients in Australia" W Goodwin, Corresponding Author W Goodwin President [email protected] Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia Chapter of Australian and New Zealand College of Veterinary Scientists Corresponding author. [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorBP Monteiro, BP Monteiro Chair World Small Animal Veterinary Association Global Pain CouncilSearch for more papers by this authorK Grimm, K Grimm American College Veterinary Anesthesia and AnalgesiaSearch for more papers by this authorPV Steagall, PV Steagall President orcid.org/0000-0003-4150-6043 Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Université de Montréal, Saint Hyacinthe, QC, Canada Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Centre for Animal Health and Welfare, Jockey Club College of Veterinary Medicine and Life Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, ChinaSearch for more papers by this author W Goodwin, Corresponding Author W Goodwin President [email protected] Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia Chapter of Australian and New Zealand College of Veterinary Scientists Corresponding author. [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorBP Monteiro, BP Monteiro Chair World Small Animal Veterinary Association Global Pain CouncilSearch for more papers by this authorK Grimm, K Grimm American College Veterinary Anesthesia and AnalgesiaSearch for more papers by this authorPV Steagall, PV Steagall President orcid.org/0000-0003-4150-6043 Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Université de Montréal, Saint Hyacinthe, QC, Canada Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Centre for Animal Health and Welfare, Jockey Club College of Veterinary Medicine and Life Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, ChinaSearch for more papers by this author First published: 16 August 2023 https://doi.org/10.1111/avj.13279Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article. References 1Naden K. Developments in surgical fluid therapy rates in veterinary medicine. Veterinary Evidence 2020; 5: 5. 2Muir WW, Ueyama Y, Pedraza-Toscano A et al. Arterial blood pressure as a predictor of the response to fluid administration in euvolemic nonhypotensive or hypotensive isoflurane-anesthetized dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2014; 245: 1021–1027. 3Schwarz A, Kalchofner K, Palm J et al. Minimum infusion rate of alfaxalone for total intravenous anaesthesia after sedation with acepromazine or medetomidine in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy. Vet Anaesth Analg 2014; 41: 480–490. 4Taboada FM, Murison PJ. Induction of anaesthesia with alfaxalone or propofol before isoflurane maintenance in cats. Vet Rec 2010; 167: 85–89. 5Beths T, Touzot-Jourde G, Musk G et al. Clinical evaluation of alfaxalone to induce and maintain anaesthesia in cats undergoing neutering procedures. J Feline Med Surg 2014; 16: 609–615. 6Liehmann L, Mosing M, Auer U. A comparison of cardiorespiratory variables during isoflurane-fentanyl and propofol-fentanyl anaesthesia for surgery in injured cats. Vet Anaesth Analg 2006; 33: 158–168. 7Killos MB, Graham LF, Lee J. Comparison of two anesthetic protocols for feline blood donation. Vet Anaesth Analg 2010; 37: 230–239. 8Robson, M, Chew D, Aalast Van S. Intrinsic acute renal failure (ARF) associated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use in juvenile cats undergoing routine desexing– 16 cases 1998–2005. Research Abstract Program of the 24th Annual ACVIM Forum 2006. 9Steagall PV, Robertson S, Simon B et al. 2022 ISFM consensus guidelines on the Management of Acute Pain in cats. J Feline Med Surg 2022; 24: 4–30. 10Grubb T, Sager J, Gaynor JS et al. 2020 AAHA anesthesia and monitoring guidelines for dogs and cats. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2020; 56: 59–82. 11Watanabe R, Doodnaught G, Proulx C et al. A multidisciplinary study of pain in cats undergoing dental extractions: a prospective, blinded, clinical trial. PloS One 2019; 14:e0213195. 12Watanabe R, Frank D, Steagall PV. Pain behaviors before and after treatment of oral disease in cats using video assessment: a prospective, blinded, randomized clinical trial. BMC Vet Res 2020; 16: 100. 13Monteiro BP, Lascelles BDX, Murrell J et al. 2022 WSAVA guidelines for the recognition, assessment and treatment of pain. Journal of Small Animal Practice 2023; 64: 177–254. Early ViewOnline Version of Record before inclusion in an issue ReferencesRelatedInformation
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".