All-in-One Pseudo-MS<sup>3</sup> Method for the Analysis of Gas-Phase Cleavable Protein Crosslinking Reactions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Crosslinking mass spectrometry (XL-MS) supports structure analysis of individual proteins and highly complex whole-cell interactomes. The identification of crosslinked peptides from enzymatic digests remains challenging, especially at the cell level. Empirical methods that use gas-phase cleavable crosslinkers can simplify the identification process by enabling an MS 3 -based strategy that turns crosslink identification into a simpler problem of detecting two separable peptides. However, the method is limited to select instrument platforms and is challenged by duty cycle constraints. Here, we revisit a pseudo-MS 3 concept that incorporates in-source fragmentation, where a fast switch between gentle high-transmission source conditions and harsher in-source fragmentation settings liberates peptides for standard MS 2 -based peptide identification. We present an all-in-one method where retention time matches between the crosslink precursor and the liberated peptides establish linkage, and MS 2 sequencing identifies the source-liberated peptides. We demonstrate that DC4, a very labile cleavable crosslinker, generates high-intensity peptides in-source. Crosslinks can be identified from these liberated peptides, as they are chromatographically well-resolved from monolinks. Using bovine serum albumin (BSA) as a crosslinking test case, we detect 27% more crosslinks with pseudo-MS 3 over a best-in-class MS 3 method. While performance is slightly lower for whole-cell lysates (generating two-thirds of the identifications of a standard method), we find that 60% of these hits are unique, highlighting the complementarity of the method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".