Guanidinylated Amphiphilic Tobramycin Derivatives Synergize with β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations against <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa ( P. aeruginosa ) was designated as a critical priority pathogen by the World Health Organization for which new therapeutic solutions are required. With the rapid dissemination of β-lactamases in P. aeruginosa, β-lactam (BL) antibiotics are used in conjunction with β-lactamase inhibitors (BLI). The effectiveness of the BL/BLI combination could be further enhanced with the inclusion of an outer membrane (OM) permeabilizer, such as aminoglycosides and aminoglycoside-based adjuvants. Thus, the development of seven tobramycin derivatives reported herein focused on improving OM permeabilizing capabilities and reducing associated toxicity. The structure–activity relationship studies emphasized the effects of the nature of the cationic group; the number of polar head groups and positive charges; and flexibility, length, and steric bulk of the hydrophobic moiety. The optimized guanidinylated tobramycin-biphenyl derivative was noncytotoxic and demonstrated the ability to potentiate ceftazidime and aztreonam monotherapy and in dual combinations with avibactam against multidrug-resistant (MDR) and β-lactamase harboring isolates of P. aeruginosa . The triple combination of ceftazidime/avibactam plus guanidinylated tobramycin-biphenyl resulted in rapid bactericidal activity within 4–8 h of treatment, demonstrating the potential application of these guanidinylated amphiphilic tobramycin derivatives in augmenting BL/BLI combinations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".