MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386062817 · doi:10.17533/udea.mut.15533

De La traduction en citations / Citas de traducción de Jean Delisle, Presses de l’Univeristé d’Ottawa, 2007. Primera entrega

2013· article· es· W4386062817 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gladys Gallego, Juan Gabriel Giraldo Ceballos, John Ramírez

Bibliographic record

VenueMutatis Mutandis Revista Latinoamericana de Traducción · 2013
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics and Discourse Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Esta es la primera entrega de una selección que, con la autorización del autor, nos proponemos presentar en versión bilingüe francés-español en los siguientes números de Mutatis Mutandis.Se trata de un trabajo sistemático y minucioso realizado por el Profesor Jean Delisle; un diccionario de citas que despertó inmediatamente nuestro interés, dado que viene a colmar un vacío de visibilidad que afecta todavía la reflexión en historia de la traducción y en traductología.El libro propone una variedad de temas en relación con la imagen de la traducción y del traductor, presentados en orden alfabético, definiendo algunas veces, otras describiendo, actitudes, concepciones y percepciones de los traductores y sobre los traductores y esto en diferentes épocas y desde diferentes perspectivas y contextos.La selección para este número comienza con Effacement du traducteur/La invisibilidad del traductor (pp.65-66 del original) en traducción de Gladys Gallego, precisamente como anti-corolario al tema de este número de Mutatis Mutandis, dedicado a la figura del traductor en la consolidación de las culturas.Pretendiendo ilustrar la "miseria y el esplendor de la traducción", el segundo grupo de citas corresponde a Art difficile/Un arte difícil (pp.10-15

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.609
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMutatis Mutandis Revista Latinoamericana de TraducciónSame topicLinguistics and Discourse AnalysisFrench-language works237,207