MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386088828 · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adg6693

A MYCN-independent mechanism mediating secretome reprogramming and metastasis in <i>MYCN</i> -amplified neuroblastoma

2023· article· en· W4386088828 on OpenAlexafffund
Hai‐Feng Zhang, Alberto Delaidelli, Sumreen Javed, Busra Turgu, Taylor Morrison, Christopher S. Hughes, Xiaqiu Yang, Manideep C. Pachva, Michael M. Lizardo, Gurdeep Singh, Jennifer Hoffmann, Yue Z. Huang, Khushbu Patel, Rawan Shraim, Sonia H.Y. Kung, Gregg B. Morin, Samuel Aparício, Daniel Martínez, John M. Maris, Kristopher R. Bosse, Karla C. Williams, Poul H. Sorensen

Bibliographic record

VenueScience Advances · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeuroblastoma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences CentreUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Cancer Agency
FundersStand Up To CancerNational Cancer InstituteNational Institutes of HealthBC Cancer FoundationMichael Smith Health Research BCLotte and John Hecht Memorial FoundationCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchAlex's Lemonade Stand Foundation for Childhood CancerDamon Runyon Cancer Research FoundationAmerican Association for Cancer Research
KeywordsNeuroblastomaMechanism (biology)ReprogrammingMetastasisCancer researchBiologyGeneticsCancerGeneCell culturePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

MYCN amplification ( MNA ) is a defining feature of high-risk neuroblastoma (NB) and predicts poor prognosis. However, whether genes within or in close proximity to the MYCN amplicon also contribute to MNA + NB remains poorly understood. Here, we identify that GREB1 , a transcription factor encoding gene neighboring the MYCN locus, is frequently coexpressed with MYCN and promotes cell survival in MNA + NB. GREB1 controls gene expression independently of MYCN, among which we uncover myosin 1B ( MYO1B ) as being highly expressed in MNA + NB and, using a chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) model, as a crucial regulator of invasion and metastasis. Global secretome and proteome profiling further delineates MYO1B in regulating secretome reprogramming in MNA + NB cells, and the cytokine MIF as an important pro-invasive and pro-metastatic mediator of MYO1B activity. Together, we have identified a putative GREB1-MYO1B-MIF axis as an unconventional mechanism promoting aggressive behavior in MNA + NB and independently of MYCN.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScience AdvancesSame topicNeuroblastoma Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207