MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4386158167 · doi:10.1101/2023.08.25.554737

Differential Regulation of Excitatory vs Inhibitory Synaptic Release by Complexin/CPX-1 and CAPS/UNC-31 at the <i>C. elegans</i> Neuromuscular Junctions

2023· preprint· en· W4386158167 on OpenAlexafffund
Ya Wang, Chun Hin Chow, Mengjia Huang, Randa Higazy, Neeraja Ramakrishnan, Cuntai Zhang, Shuzo Sugita, Shangbang Gao

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
Canadian institutionsLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteMount Sinai HospitalUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of HealthNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsExcitatory postsynaptic potentialExcitatory synapseInhibitory postsynaptic potentialBiologyNeuromuscular junctionSynaptic vesicleCell biologySynapseNeuroscienceVesicleBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The excitation and inhibition (E/I) balance at neuromuscular junctions plays a crucial role in coordinating animal motor behavior. Prominent synaptic vesicle secretory regulatory proteins, specifically complexin and CAPS (Calcium-dependent Activator Protein for Secretion), have not garnered sufficient attention for E/I balance regulation. Here, we investigate the roles of complexin/CPX-1 and CAPS/UNC-31 in excitatory vs inhibitory synapses of C. elegans neuromuscular junctions. In our study, cpx-1 null mutants displayed remarkable reduction evoked release in both excitatory and inhibitory synapses. Intriguingly, these mutants exhibited an enhanced level of spontaneous release, particularly within the context of excitatory synapse. This enhancement aligns with its “clamp” role that preventing SV from fusing with the presynaptic membrane. Additionally, a clamping-specific knockin mutant cpx-1(Δ12) , which displayed no alterations in evoked release at either type of synapse, also revealed a biased substantial increase in excitatory spontaneous release. In contrast, unc-31 null mutation, with normal spontaneous release, led to a more pronounced decreased evoked release in the excitatory synapse independent of dense-core vesicle regulation. Intriguingly, we found that the enhanced excitatory spontaneous release observed in cpx-1 mutants was abolished by unc-31 in a Ca 2+ -dependent manner, implying that UNC-31 is essential for maintaining a high level of spontaneous fusion events. Collectively, our findings unveil a distinct regulatory pattern governing excitatory and inhibitory synaptic release, orchestrated by the interplay of CPX-1 and UNC-31. Notably, we uncover an unforeseen role of UNC-31 in influencing CPX-1’s “clamp” function, further adding complexity to the neural dynamics, which may underlie complex behavioral phenotypes observed in C. elegans .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms→French-language works237,207→