P10.22.B COMBINATION OF ARTS MIMETICS WITH AUTOPHAGY INHIBITORS AS A NOVEL THERAPEUTIC STRATEGY TO OVERCOME APOPTOSIS RESISTANCE IN GLIOBLASTOMA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract BACKGROUND Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant brain tumour in adults. The current standard of care for GBM patients consists of maximal surgical resection followed by chemotherapy and radiation. Despite such an aggressive treatment approach, the average 5-year survival rate for GBM patients is approximately 5%. One of the main reasons for poor therapy response in the GBM is resistance to programmed cell death, otherwise known as apoptosis. One of the mechanisms behind apoptosis resistance relies on the upregulation of inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (IAPs) which are known to hinder pro-apoptotic proteins and allow cell survival under abnormal conditions such as severe DNA damage. However, there are natural IAP antagonists such as ARTS which are capable of stimulating cell death by promoting the degradation of IAPs. To harness the pro-apoptotic function of IAP antagonists, small peptide mimetics of ARTS have been developed. This project investigates the efficacy of utilizing ARTS mimetics as a novel strategy to overcome apoptosis resistance in the GBM treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS This study utilizes patient-derived cells with exogenous gain-of-function (GOF) overexpression to introduce full-length ARTS protein as well as pharmacological small peptide mimetics of ARTS to evaluate the response of GBM cells following the promotion of ARTS activity. We also employ a patient-derived orthotopic xenograft mouse model to test novel combinatorial strategies in vivo, where we used a nanoparticle drug delivery system to ensure treatment delivery across the blood-brain barrier (BBB). RESULTS We found that patient-derived GBM cells were highly resistant to ARTS-induced apoptosis. Further molecular investigation unveiled a novel role of ARTS in the upregulation of autophagy as a resistance mechanism. A combination of ARTS GOF or mimetic peptides with autophagy inhibitors mitigated resistance to ARTS-mediated apoptosis and drastically decreased GBM cell proliferation. This combination was further tested in the patient-derived xenograft mouse model, which demonstrated the successful delivery of ARTS mimetic peptides and autophagy inhibitors through the BBB via nanoparticle lipid carriers. Animals treated with a combination of the autophagy inhibitor Spautin-1 and ARTS mimetic peptides demonstrated significantly prolonged survival, confirming the therapeutic potential of such combinatorial approach for GBM treatment. CONCLUSION Altogether, these findings uncover a previously unknown role of ARTS in autophagy regulation and provide evidence that the combination of IAP-antagonist mimetics with autophagy inhibitors can be an effective strategy against highly aggressive GBM brain tumours. This work was supported by the Health Sciences Centre Foundation (HSCF).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".