MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386634361 · doi:10.3233/blc-230056

Advancing Clinical Trial Design for Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer

2023· article· en· W4386634361 on OpenAlexaff
Elaine Chang, Noah M. Hahn, Seth P. Lerner, Jaleh Fallah, Sundeep Agrawal, Ashish M. Kamat, Vishal Bhatnagar, Robert S. Svatek, Adnan A. Jaigirdar, Peter Bross, Neal D. Shore, Max Kates, Karen Sachse, Jamie R. Brewer, Michael A. O’Donnell, Gary D. Steinberg, Charles J. Viviano, Erik Bloomquist, María J. Ribal, Matthew D. Galsky, R. G. Oliver, Peter C. Black, Hikmat Al‐Ahmadie, Kenneth Brothers, Kamal S. Pohar, Colin P. Dinney, Zhou Feng, Tracy M. Downs, Sima P. Porten, Angela B. Smith, Rick Bangs, Sarah P. Psutka, Neeraj Agarwal, Laleh Amiri‐Kordestani, Daniel L. Suzman, Richard Pazdur, Paul G. Kluetz, Chana Weinstock

Bibliographic record

VenueBladder Cancer · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersEMD SeronoNational Cancer InstituteNateraMedacAstellas PharmaEisaiGenentechUroGen PharmaNational Institutes of HealthIncyteBristol-Myers SquibbAstraZenecaUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterPfizerPatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
KeywordsBladder cancerMedicineFood and drug administrationClinical trialDrugIntensive care medicineOncologyClinical researchCancerInternal medicinePharmacology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Despite recent drug development for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), few therapies have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and there remains an unmet clinical need. Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) supply issues underscore the importance of developing safe and effective drugs for NMIBC. OBJECTIVE: On November 18-19, 2021, the FDA held a public virtual workshop to discuss NMIBC research needs and potential trial designs for future development of effective therapies. METHODS: Representatives from various disciplines including urologists, oncologists, pathologists, statisticians, basic and translational scientists, and the patient advocacy community participated. The workshop format included invited lectures, panel discussions, and opportunity for audience discussion and comment. RESULTS: In a pre-workshop survey, 92% of urologists surveyed considered the development of alternatives to BCG as a high drug development priority for BCG-naïve high-risk patients. Key topics discussed included definitions of disease states; trial design for BCG-naïve NMIBC, BCG-unresponsive carcinoma in situ, and BCG-unresponsive papillary carcinoma; strengths and limitations of single-arm trial designs; assessing patient-reported outcomes; and considerations for assessing avoidance of cystectomy as an efficacy measure. CONCLUSIONS: The workshop discussed several important opportunities for trial design refinement in NMIBC. FDA encourages sponsors to meet with the appropriate review division to discuss trial design proposals for NMIBC early in drug development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.394
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.117
GPT teacher head0.420
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBladder CancerSame topicBladder and Urothelial Cancer TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207