Real-world safety and effectiveness of inhaled nitric oxide therapy for pulmonary hypertension during the perioperative period of cardiac surgery: a post-marketing study of 2817 patients in Japan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Objective To evaluate the real-world safety and effectiveness of inhaled nitric oxide (INOflo ® for Inhalation 800 ppm) for perioperative pulmonary hypertension associated with cardiac surgery in Japan. Methods This was a prospective, non-interventional, all-case, post-marketing study of pediatric and adult patients who received perioperative INOflo with cardiac surgery from November 2015–December 2020. Safety and effectiveness were monitored from INOflo initiation to 48 h after treatment completion or withdrawal. Safety outcomes included adverse drug reactions, blood methemoglobin concentrations, and inspired nitrogen dioxide concentrations over time. Effectiveness outcomes included changes in central venous pressure among pediatrics, mean pulmonary arterial pressure among adults, and the partial pressure of arterial oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio (PaO 2 /FiO 2 ) in both populations. Results The safety analysis population included 2,817 Japanese patients registered from 253 clinical sites (pediatrics, n = 1375; adults, n = 1442). INOflo was generally well tolerated; 15 and 20 adverse drug reactions were reported in 14 pediatrics (1.0%) and 18 adults (1.2%), respectively. No clinically significant elevations in blood methemoglobin and inspired nitrogen dioxide concentrations were observed. INOflo treatment was associated with significant reductions in both central venous pressure among pediatrics and mean pulmonary arterial pressure among adults, and significant improvements in PaO 2 /FiO 2 among pediatrics and adults with PaO 2 /FiO 2 ≤ 200 at baseline. Conclusions Perioperative INOflo treatment was a safe and effective strategy to improve hemodynamics and oxygenation in patients with pulmonary hypertension during cardiac surgery. These data support the use of INOflo for this indication in Japanese clinical practice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".