“Wrecking the rocks”: Continental weathering by groundwater
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Groundwater solute mass flux discharged from the continents to the oceans is between 56% and 63% of particulate sediment transport mass flux. Herein we utilized newly developed continental geospatial groundwater concentration estimates that were multiplied by groundwater volumetric recharge flux to provide a continental-scale discharge mass flux to the oceans of 7.3 Pg DS/yr (petagrams dissolved solutes per year). This mass flux was evaluated from six continental ecosystems: direct ocean discharge (0.28 Pg DS/yr), endorheic basins (0.59 Pg DS/yr), cold-wet exorheic basins (0.55 Pg DS/yr), cold-dry exorheic basins (1.1 Pg DS/yr), warm-dry exorheic basins (0.82 Pg DS/yr), and warm-wet exorheic basins (4.0 Pg DS/yr), thus providing insight into the role of rainfall and temperature on continental weathering and denudation. A new, robust molar silicate/carbonate ratio of 0.42 was calculated for weathering of continental rocks, which is important in the Urey model of climate change. We estimate that rock weathering accounts for ~50% of the total solute mass flux discharged from the continents, the remainder being from externally derived marine aerosols and organic-derived bicarbonate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".