MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387296735 · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-1735

Intratumoral Delivery of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells Targeting CD133 Effectively Treats Brain Metastases

2023· article· en· W4387296735 on OpenAlexafffund
Agata Kieliszek, Daniel Mobilio, Deepak Upreti, Darin Bloemberg, Laura Escudero, Jacek M. Kwiecień, Zahra Alizada, Kui Zhai, P T Ang, Shawn C. Chafe, Parvez Vora, Chitra Venugopal, Sheila K. Singh

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCAR-T cell therapy research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityJuravinski Cancer Centre
FundersCanadian Cancer Society Research InstituteCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanada Foundation for InnovationMitacsCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsChimeric antigen receptorMedicineAntigenPopulationCancer researchCancer stem cellMetastasisImmunotherapyImmunologyOncologyCancerInternal medicineImmune system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Brain metastases (BM) are mainly treated palliatively with an expected survival of less than 12 months after diagnosis. In many solid tumors, the human neural stem cell marker glycoprotein CD133 is a marker of a tumor-initiating cell population that contributes to therapy resistance, relapse, and metastasis. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Here, we use a variant of our previously described CD133 binder to generate second-generation CD133-specific chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T) to demonstrate its specificity and efficacy against multiple patient-derived BM cell lines with variable CD133 antigen expression. RESULTS: Using both lung- and colon-BM patient-derived xenograft models, we show that a CD133-targeting CAR-T cell therapy can evoke significant tumor reduction and survival advantage after a single dose, with complete remission observed in the colon-BM model. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, these data suggest that CD133 plays a critical role in fueling the growth of BM, and immunotherapeutic targeting of this cell population is a feasible strategy to control the outgrowth of BM tumors that are otherwise limited to palliative care. See related commentary by Sloan et al., p. 477.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.110
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.207
GPT teacher head0.520
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer ResearchSame topicCAR-T cell therapy researchFrench-language works237,207