Abstract P1183: Phosphorylation Signatures Of Human Heart Failure: Characterizing Dilated Cardiomyopathy-associated Signaling Pathways At The Cardiomyocyte Intercalated Disc
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Heart failure remains a highly prevalent condition with diverse etiology, yet the underlying signaling mechanisms are not fully understood. Despite the profound effects of post-translational protein modifications on downstream signaling, limited studies have investigated the cardiac phosphoproteome in human heart failure. We hypothesized that a combined proteomic and phosphoproteomic analysis of human dilated (DCM) and ischemic (ICM) cardiomyopathy would reveal novel etiology-associated disease pathways. Integrative analyses of left ventricular explants from DCM patients ( n =4) vs. non-failing controls ( n =4), and left ventricular infarct vs. non-infarct, and peri-infarct vs. non-infarct regions of ICM patients ( n =4) identified 5,570 unique proteins with 13,624 corresponding phosphorylation sites. Each pair-wise comparison revealed shared and etiology-specific signatures, with a unique DCM-associated enrichment of cell-cell adhesion pathways. We focused our attention on αT-catenin (CTNNA3) as a cardiomyocyte intercalated disc candidate phosphoprotein with a unique cluster of 4 hyperphosphorylated sites in DCM hearts ( P <0.0001). Overexpression of non-phosphorylatable hCTNNA3 in ex vivo isolated adult mouse cardiomyocytes showed internalized protein expression and weaker cell-cell adhesion vs. wildtype (WT) and phospho-mimetic forms. We established an in vivo mouse model using recombinant adeno-associated virus 9 (rAAV9) harboring hCTNNA3-WT, hCTNNA3-phospho-null, or empty rAAV9 control. Phospho-null CTNNA3 mice developed left ventricular dilation and contractile dysfunction (% EF; 51.25±1.17 phospho-null vs. 62.07±1.20 WT vs. 66.76±1.42 empty; n ≥10) with impaired left ventricular conduction velocity (cm/s; 36.83±1.10 phospho-null vs. 47.74±2.04 WT; n =6), by echocardiography and ex vivo optical mapping. Loss of CTNNA3 phosphorylation led to intercalated disc remodeling with internalization and dissociation of CTNNA3, connexin 43, N-cadherin, β-catenin, and plakophilin 2 from the adherens junction, using high-resolution confocal imaging. Together these findings reveal a compensatory role for αT-catenin phosphorylation in maintaining cardiomyocyte intercalated disc organization in human DCM.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".