MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387665376 · doi:10.15173/ijsap.v7i2.5484

Co-facilitating pedagogy circles for diversity, equity, and inclusion: Two student-partner experiences

2023· article· en· W4387665376 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Abhirami P. Suresh, Piper Rofles

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal for Students as Partners · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCollaborative Teaching and Inclusion
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInclusion (mineral)Equity (law)PedagogyDiversity (politics)SociologyPsychologyPolitical scienceGender studiesAnthropology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The idea of a "pedagogy circle" was developed by several faculty members and undergraduate students at Bryn Mawr College in the summer of 2020 through the Summer Pedagogical Partnership Program.An extension of the Students as Learners and Teachers (SaLT) program at Bryn Mawr and Haverford Colleges, this work focused on preparing for the sudden shift to online teaching and learning prompted by COVID-19 (Cook-Sather & Bala, 2022).Starting in the Fall of 2020, the SaLT program began to offer Pedagogy Circles for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, co-facilitated by pairs of SaLT student partners and hosted via Zoom.This forum proved important both to continue to support college community members in managing pandemic conditions and to reckon with the demands that emerged from the strikes for racial justice that our campuses experienced that Fall, led primarily by BIPOC (Black, Indigenous, People of Color) students.These pedagogy circles foster cross-constituency dialogue about working toward antiracism, diversity, inclusivity, and equity within and beyond classrooms.Any interested faculty member, administrator, staff member, and student in this bi-college consortium is welcome to participate.Each semester we send around an announcement of the forum and a sign-up form, which automatically sends a Zoom link to those who sign up.The sessions last for 1 hour, and we typically offer two or three sessions per week.This forum has expanded to include other options, such as the Pedagogy Circle for BIPOC Faculty-a space for BIPOC faculty co-facilitated by BIPOC students (Cook-Sather et al., 2023).We are two SaLT student partners who began co-facilitating Pedagogy Circles for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in the Fall of 2022.Below we introduce ourselves and describe how we restructured and facilitated pedagogy circles that semester.By design, circles are open to everyone on campus, though the participants that semester were all faculty members.Since then, we have had students join us.We acknowledge that student and faculty responsibilities, both academic and otherwise, may prevent their participation.In this essay, we reflect on what we have learned as students, facilitators, and people and how we see this forum as a unique space in which to practice this form of partnership work.The relationships we built as co-facilitators and with circle participants are collaborative,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0230.010
Scholarly communication0.0150.007
Open science0.0030.026
Research integrity0.0050.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.115
GPT teacher head0.625
Teacher spread0.510 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal for Students as PartnersSame topicCollaborative Teaching and InclusionFrench-language works237,207