GWAS for the composite traits of hematuria and albuminuria
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Our GWAS of hematuria in the UK Biobank identified 6 loci, some of which overlap with loci for albuminuria suggesting pleiotropy. Since clinical syndromes are often defined by combinations of traits, generating a combined phenotype can improve power to detect loci influencing multiple characteristics. Thus the composite trait of hematuria and albuminuria was chosen to enrich for glomerular pathologies. Cases had both hematuria defined by ICD codes and albuminuria defined as uACR > 3 mg/mmol. Controls had neither an ICD code for hematuria nor an uACR > 3 mg/mmol. 2429 cases and 343,509 controls from the UK Biobank were included. eGFR was lower in cases compared to controls, with the exception of the comparison in females using CKD-EPI after age adjustment. Variants at 4 loci met genome-wide significance with the following nearest genes: COL4A4, TRIM27, ETV1 and CUBN. TRIM27 is part of the extended MHC locus. All loci with the exception of ETV1 were replicated in the Geisinger MyCode cohort. The previous GWAS of hematuria reported COL4A3-COL4A4 variants and HLA-B*0801 within MHC, which is in linkage disequilibrium with the TRIM27 variant (D' = 0.59). TRIM27 is highly expressed in the tubules. Additional loci included a coding sequence variant in CUBN (p.Ala2914Val, MAF = 0.014 (A), p = 3.29E-8, OR = 2.09, 95% CI = 1.61-2.72). Overall, GWAS for the composite trait of hematuria and albuminuria identified 4 loci, 2 of which were not previously identified in a GWAS of hematuria.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".