MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

695 Efficacy and safety of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) with durvalumab in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (HER2 altered NSCLC) who progressed on anti-PD1/PD-L1 therapy (HUDSON)

2023· article· en· W4388042564 on OpenAlexaff
Parneet Cheema, Sylvia Hartl, Marianna Koczywas, Maximilian J. Hochmair, Frances A. Shepherd, Quincy S. Chu, Giuseppe Galletti, Mark Gustavson, Sonia Iyer, J. Carl Barrett, Brent Evans, Rakesh Kumar, Jan Cosaert, Keunchil Park, John V. Heymach

Bibliographic record

VenueRegular and Young Investigator Award Abstracts · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDurvalumabMedicineInternal medicineClinical endpointOncologyTremelimumabLung cancerTrastuzumabnon-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)Adverse effectCancerImmunotherapyClinical trialNivolumabIpilimumabBreast cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background The HUDSON platform study (NCT03334617) explores investigational therapies in patients (pts) with NSCLC who progressed on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to overcome immune resistance in the post-ICI setting. HUDSON allocated treatment based on biomarker selection or on time (<24 vs. ≥ 24 weeks) before progression on prior ICI. Here, we report on the results of Durvalumab (anti-PD-L1) + T-DXd (anti-HER2 antibody drug conjugate) treatment (module 6) in pts with HER2 overexpressing or HER2 mutant tumours. Methods Pts had documented advanced/metastatic NSCLC with centrally confirmed HER2 overexpression (HER2e) or activating mutations (HER2m), received platinum-based therapy and progressed on prior ICI. Pts received durvalumab 1120 mg iv and T-DXd 5.4 mg/kg iv every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1 criteria; secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and frequency of adverse events (AEs). Results A total of 43 pts (HER2e n=23, HER2m n=20) started therapy between 23/6/2020 and 16/9/2021. Differences in main demographic and disease characteristics at study entry were observed between HER2e and HER2m pts (sex, smoking status, extent of disease, primary resistance to prior ICI; extended report of the characteristics at the conference). Confirmed ORR was 26.1% (80% CI, 14.3–41.3) in HER2e pts and 35% (80% CI, 20.7–51.8) in HER2m pts. Median PFS was 2.8 mo (80% CI, 2.2–5.5) in HER2e pts and 5.7 mo (80% CI, 5.5–6.5) in HER2m pts. Median OS was 9.5 mo (80% CI, 6.6–12.4) in the HER2e group and 10.6 mo (80% CI, 8.9-NC) in the HER2m group. Median duration of follow-up in censored subjects was 16.5 mo (range, 7.3–24.2) in the HER2e pts and 17.1 mo (range, 4.4–27.6) in HER2m pts. Grade (G) ≥3 treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs) occurred in 55% of all pts (61% of HER2e pts, 50% of HER2m pts); the most common G ≥3 AEs were pneumonitis (none were fatal), pulmonary embolism and anemia. All grade and G≥3 treatment-related pneumonitis occurred in 9.3% (8.7% of HER2e pts, 10% of HER2m pts) and in 7% (8.7% of HER2e pts, 5% of HER2m pts) of all pts, respectively. Conclusions Durvalumab+T-DXd combination was tolerated and showed antitumor activity in HER2 altered NSCLC in the post-ICI setting, with a trend toward higher response in HER2m pts. The small sample size limits the overall conclusions of the study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRegular and Young Investigator Award AbstractsSame topicCancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersFrench-language works237,207