Molecular profiling in cholangiocarcinoma: A practical guide to next-generation sequencing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinomas (CCA) are a heterogeneous group of tumors that are classified as intrahepatic, perihilar, or distal according to the anatomic location within the biliary tract. Each CCA subtype is associated with distinct genomic alterations, including single nucleotide variants, copy number variants, and chromosomal rearrangements or gene fusions, each of which can influence disease prognosis and/or treatment outcomes. Molecular profiling using next-generation sequencing (NGS) is a powerful technique for identifying unique gene variants carried by an individual tumor, which can facilitate their accurate diagnosis as well as promote the optimal selection of gene variant-matched targeted treatments. NGS is particularly useful in patients with CCA because between one-third and one-half of these patients have genomic alterations that can be targeted by drugs that are either approved or in clinical development. NGS can also provide information about disease evolution and secondary resistance alterations that can develop during targeted therapy, and thus facilitate assessment of prognosis and choice of alternative targeted treatments. Pathologists play a critical role in assessing the viability of biopsy samples for NGS, and advising treating clinicians whether NGS can be performed and which of the available platforms should be used to optimize testing outcomes. This review aims to provide clinical pathologists and other healthcare professionals with practical step-by-step guidance on the use of NGS for molecular profiling of patients with CCA, with respect to tumor biopsy techniques, pre-analytic sample preparation, selecting the appropriate NGS panel, and understanding and interpreting results of the NGS test.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".