MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388492121 · doi:10.7769/gesec.v14i11.3135

The trends of policy research onto non-public preschool education –findings from scopus database

2023· article· en· W4388492121 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Minh Thu, Thang The Nguyen, Binh T. Ho, Hong Thi Thuy Pham

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista de Gestão e Secretariado (Management and Administrative Professional Review) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicChild and Adolescent Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFogarty International CenterNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNational Health and Medical Research CouncilEuropean Regional Development FundEconomic and Social Research CouncilMedical Research CouncilBộ Giáo dục và Ðào tạoCenters for Disease Control and PreventionUnited States Agency for International DevelopmentCanada Research ChairsCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchWellcome TrustGovernment of the United KingdomNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesRobert Wood Johnson FoundationBill and Melinda Gates Foundation
KeywordsScopusEarly childhood educationPublic policyEarly childhoodPublic educationPolitical scienceEducation policyField (mathematics)Economic growthHigher educationPsychologyPublic administrationMEDLINEEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Public education is not only an option for early childhood education in countries around the world; this makes non-public preschool policy even more important when the objectives, content, and programs are met and all issues related to early childhood education of non-public forces can contribute to this important level of education. With data from the Scopus system and the quantitative bibliographic method, this study aims to provide a general picture of how research trends in non-public policy on early childhood education have been studied. The results show that the number of non-public preschool policy research studies is not much, although the number has gradually increased in recent years. Publication is mainly in developed countries and in the field of medicine. Therefore, there is a need for more detailed studies on each aspect of non-public policy on early childhood education by region, level of development, industry, and interdisciplinary trends in this policy issue.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.335
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.137
GPT teacher head0.511
Teacher spread0.374 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista de Gestão e Secretariado (Management and Administrative Professional Review)Same topicChild and Adolescent HealthFrench-language works237,207