Analysis on The Origin, Development and Contribution of Ge’ez Numerals to The Modern Mathematics Education in Ethiopia: Status, Challenges and Future Opportunities.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
From the Ethiopian ancient history, it is believed that among the first peoples to inhabit was the Ge’ez speaking agrarians who settled in the Tigrayan highlands (Northern Ethiopia) around 2000BC. The inland Axum Kingdom was founded by Menilik I, a descendent of King Solomon and the Queen of Sheba, after the fall of the Da’amat Kingdom. Associated with the letters in the Ethiopian alphabet starting from ancient times, there are the Ge’ez numerals also called Ethiopic numerals. This study, therefore, purely used qualitative data obtained from interviewees and document analysis. The data obtained are narrated and organized. Patterns are identified and categorized. Finally, interpretations and implications of findings are included in the analysis. Findings indicated that there is a need for modification of the Ge’ez numbers by removing the bars above and below the original skeleton of the numbers so that doing mathematics with them becomes easier. Beyond this modification, evidence indicated that the Ge’ez numbers cannot be used for doing mathematical operations without the introduction of Ge’ez zero. Without the Ge’ez zero, it is impossible to deal with place value, decimal, and fractions, as well as with the common operations (addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division) and higher mathematics in general. Finally, it is the recommendation of this study to work towards awareness creation and consensus building about the common understanding and misunderstanding of Ge’ez numeration system at all levels as well as introducing this numeration system in to the school system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".