CTNI-24. CLINICAL ACTIVITY AND SAFETY OF THE RAF INHIBITOR TOVORAFENIB IN PATIENTS WITH OPTIC PATHWAY GLIOMAS IN THE REGISTRATIONAL PEDIATRIC LOW-GRADE GLIOMA ARM OF THE PHASE 2 FIREFLY-1 (PNOC026) STUDY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract BACKGROUND Optic pathway gliomas (OPG) are low-grade gliomas (LGG) comprising 3-5% of pediatric brain tumors. Morbidity may include visual loss (acuity and visual fields), hypothalamic/pituitary dysfunction, and/or impaired motor function. Genomic alterations of MAPK/BRAF are frequent oncogenic drivers in pediatric LGG. Activity of tovorafenib, an investigational, oral, selective, CNS-penetrant, type II RAF inhibitor in OPGs was analyzed. METHODS FIREFLY-1 (NCT04775485) is a phase 2 study evaluating tovorafenib (420 mg/m2 weekly) in patients 6 months–25 years with BRAF-altered recurrent/progressive LGG or solid tumors. Independently assessed overall response rate (ORR), as defined by RANO-HGG and RANO-LGG criteria, are primary and exploratory endpoints. RESULTS Of the 77 patients enrolled in arm 1 (measurable disease per RANO-HGG), 42 (55%) had tumors located in the optic pathway. Median age at enrollment was 8 years (range: 2–16); 37 (88%) harbored a BRAF fusion and 5 (12%) a BRAF V600E mutation. The median prior lines of systemic therapy was 3 (range: 1–9), with 69% having received prior MAPK inhibitors. Of the 39 evaluable patients (RANO-HGG), the ORR was 59% (1 CR, 22 PRs) with a median time to response (TTR) of 2.8 months; 14 (36%) had stable disease (SD). Per RANO-LGG (n = 42), the ORR was 43% (5 PRs; 13 MRs) with a median TTR of 4.1 months; 20 (48%) had SD. Visual acuity remained stable in 79% (23) of patients (Cycle 9, n = 29 assessed). The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade in this subgroup were hair color changes (81%), increased creatine phosphokinase (55%), anemia (48%), maculopapular rash (45%), and fatigue (41%). Dose modifications occurred in 14 (33%) and discontinuations in 3 (7%) patients due to TRAEs. CONCLUSIONS Tovorafenib demonstrated antitumor activity in recurrent/progressive BRAF-altered OPG and was generally well tolerated. Visual acuity remained stable for the majority with OPGs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".