Deucravacitinib, an Oral, Selective, Allosteric Tyrosine Kinase 2 Inhibitor, in Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis: Absolute PASI Outcomes Over 52 Weeks in the Phase 3 POETYK PSO-1 Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) is an intracellular enzyme that mediates signaling of cytokines (eg, interleukin-23, Type I interferons) involved in psoriasis pathogenesis. Deucravacitinib, an oral, selective, allosteric TYK2 inhibitor, is approved in the US, EU, and other countries for the treatment of adults with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who are candidates for systemic therapy. In POETYK PSO-1 (NCT03624127) and POETYK PSO-2 (NCT03611751), deucravacitinib was significantly more effective vs placebo and apremilast based on multiple endpoints. This study compared efficacy of deucravacitinib vs apremilast over 24 weeks in mean Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) improvements and evaluated absolute PASI thresholds with continuous deucravacitinib treatment from Day 1 through 52 weeks in PSO-1. Methods: PSO-1 randomized patients 1:2:1 to oral placebo, deucravacitinib 6 mg once daily, or apremilast 30 mg twice daily; patients randomized to placebo and apremilast switched to deucravacitinib at Week 16 and Week 24, respectively. Mean change from baseline in PASI and proportions of patients achieving absolute PASI thresholds of ≤1, ≤2, ≤3, ≤4, and ≤5 were evaluated at Week 24 (deucravacitinib vs apremilast) and Week 52 (deucravacitinib only). Results: Mean baseline PASI was similar in both groups (deucravacitinib, 21.8; apremilast, 21.4). Significantly greater mean percent reductions from baseline in PASI were observed with deucravacitinib vs apremilast at Week 24 (−77.1% vs −50.2%; P < 0.0001); mean reduction in the deucravacitinib group was maintained through Week 52 (−78.4%). Higher proportions of patients receiving deucravacitinib vs apremilast, respectively, achieved absolute PASI thresholds of ≤1 (31.3% vs 12.5%), ≤2 (41.3% vs 21.4%), ≤3 (54.8% vs 28.0%), ≤4 (63.3% vs 33.3%), and ≤5 (68.7% vs 35.7%) at Week 24 (nominal P < 0.0001 for all); response rates were maintained through Week 52 with deucravacitinib (31.3%, 45.5%, 54.5%, 61.4%, and 66.0%, respectively). Conclusions: Deucravacitinib treatment was associated with clinically meaningful PASI outcomes that were superior to apremilast over 24 weeks and maintained through 52 weeks in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".