MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Mitochondrial‐Targeted Peptide SBT‐20 Improves Mitochondrial Bioenergetics In Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy In a Mitochondrial Creatine Kinase Dependent Manner

2017· article· en· W4389021577 on OpenAlexaffabout
Meghan C. Hughes, Sofhia V. Ramos, Nazari Polidovitch, Peter H. Backx, Christopher G. R. Perry

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMuscle Physiology and Disorders
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersJames H. Cummings Foundation
KeywordsDuchenne muscular dystrophyDystrophinCreatine kinaseBioenergeticsInternal medicineMitochondrionEndocrinologyMyopathyCreatineOxidative phosphorylationUtrophinMuscular dystrophyMitochondrial myopathyBiologyCardiomyopathyChemistryMitochondrial DNAMedicineBiochemistryHeart failureGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RATIONALE Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy is a progressive muscle wasting disease in males resulting from mutations in the X‐linked gene dystrophin. The loss of dystrophin in the dystroglycan complex causes severe muscle pathology including cardiomyopathy which can lead to early death. While the cardiac dysfunction in mouse models of this disease has been well characterized, the precise signaling events contributing to this myopathy have yet to be determined. Given that this disease is associated with markers of oxidative stress, and that other models of cardiac dysfunction are associated with impaired mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (respiration) and elevated oxidant emission (H 2 O 2 ), we hypothesized that similar dysfunctions would exist in D2.B10‐DMD mdx /2J mice (DMD) that could be corrected with the mitochondrial targeted peptide SBT‐20. METHODS Left ventricular mitochondrial H 2 O 2 emission (spectrofluorometry; Amplex UltraRed fluorophore) and respiration (high‐resolution respirometry; Oroboros Oxygraph) were assessed in permeabilized muscle fibre bundles (PmFB) at 4 wk of age in DMD and DBA.2J wildtype (CONT), and again at 13–14 wk in DMD following daily subcutaneous injections of SBT‐20 (5mg/kg) or saline (0.9%) from 4 d for 12 weeks. H 2 O 2 emission was measured in the presence of physiological ADP (25μM) given ADP is a critical suppressor of H 2 O 2 emission during respiration that can be influenced by the phosphate‐shuttling activity of mitochondrial creatine kinase (mtCK). The contribution of mtCK was assessed by saturating [creatine] (Cr) in vitro. RESULTS AND INTERPRETATION At 4 wk, ADP‐suppression (25μM) of Complex I‐supported H 2 O 2 (5mM Pyruvate/2mM Malate) was impaired in DMD in the presence of Cr (+Cr; 36+/−4% of emission at 0μM ADP in DMD vs 12+/−1% of emission at 0μM ADP in CONT when expressed per O 2 consumed; p<0.01). This was also observed in the absence of Cr (−Cr; 36+/−4 vs 17+/−2% of 0μM ADP/O 2 consumed, p<0.01) suggesting H 2 O 2 emission is elevated in DMD independent of mtCK‐dependent phosphate shuttling. At this same [ADP], complex I‐supported respiration was lower in DMD vs CONT in both +Cr: (30.8+/−5.0 vs 54.2+/−10.2 pmol•s −1 •mg wet wt −1 , p<0.05) and ‐ Cr (35.0+/−1.2 vs 52.0+/−5.4 pmol•s −1 •mg wet wt −1 , p<0.01). After ~12 wk injections, SBT‐20‐treated DMD demonstrated greater ADP‐suppression of Complex I‐supported H 2 O 2 vs CONT in +Cr (12+/−1% vs 15+/−0 % of emission at 0μM ADP/O 2 consumed, p<0.01). However, there were no differences in ‐Cr (40+/−11 vs 42+/−13 % of 0μM ADP/O 2 consumed), suggesting SBT‐20 specifically improved mtCK‐dependent ADP suppression of H 2 O 2 emission. SBT‐20 did not change respiration in DMD vs CONT in +Cr (111.4 +/− 12.0 vs 82.1 +/− 11.2 pmol•s −1 •mg wet wt −1 , p=0.10) or –Cr condition (59.6 +/− 7.4 vs 65.3 +/− 6.8 pmol•s −1 •mg wet wt −1 ). Collectively, these findings demonstrate that SBT‐20 is an effective therapeutic approach for improving the ability of mtCK to mediate ADP‐suppression of H 2 O 2 in DMD heart. Support or Funding Information Funding was provided to C.G.R.P. by National Science and Engineering Research Council (#436138‐2013) with infrastructure supported by Canada Foundation for Innovation, Ontario Research Fund and the James H. Cummings Foundation. M.C.H. was supported by an NSERC CGS‐D scholarship.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicMuscle Physiology and Disorders→French-language works237,207→