MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389029020 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofad500.2471

2888. Safety and Immunogenicity of an Adjuvanted Chikungunya Virus (CHIKV) Virus-like Particle (VLP) Based Vaccine in Two Pivotal Phase 3 Trials, ≥12 Years of Age

2023· article· en· W4389029020 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jason S. Richardson, Debbie Anderson, Jason Mendy, Sufia Muhammad, Lauren C. Tindale, Tobi Loreth, Sarah Royalty Tredo, Victoria Jenkins, Patrick Ajiboye, Lisa Bedell

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMosquito-borne diseases and control
Canadian institutionsNordic Life Science Pipeline (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePlaceboImmunogenicityAdverse effectTiterInternal medicineVaccinationRandomizationImmunologyClinical trialVirusAntibodyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background CHIKV remains a significant public health concern globally. We report the results of two phase 3 trials evaluating an aluminum hydroxide adjuvanted CHIKV VLP vaccine. Methods Two multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trials were conducted: an adult/adolescent trial (NCT05072080) in ages 12-64 years and an older adult trial in ages ≥ 65 years (NCT05349617). Participants received CHIKV VLP vaccine or placebo as a single intramuscular dose. Immunogenicity objectives assessed anti-CHIKV NT80 serum neutralizing antibody (SNA) titers at selected timepoints. Seroresponse rate (SRR) was the percentage of participants who achieved NT80 SNA titer ≥ 100 (FDA/EMA agreed threshold). Safety outcomes were evaluated through monitoring adverse events (AEs) through Day 183. Study overview. Results Adult/adolescent trial: 3254 participants (2790 CHIKV VLP vaccine, 464 placebo) were enrolled. Primary endpoints were met with a Day 22 SRR of 98% (2503/2559) for vaccine and 1% for placebo (5/424; p< 0.0001), as well as lot consistency, and superiority to placebo in geometric mean titer (GMT). A rapid antibody response was observed in the CHIKV VLP vaccine group with Day 8 SRR=47% (1169/2510) and Day 15 SRR=97% (2355/2434); responses were durable through Day 183 with SRR=86% (1967/2301). Older adult trial: 413 participants (206 CHIKV VLP vaccine, 207 placebo) were enrolled. Primary endpoints were met with a Day 22 SRR of 87% (167/191) for vaccine and 1% for placebo (2/183; p< 0.0001), as well as by GMT. At Day 15 a rapid antibody response was observed in the CHIKV VLP vaccine group with SRR=82% (150/182). CHIKV VLP vaccine demonstrated a favorable safety profile, and most AEs were mild to moderate in severity. The most common AEs were myalgia, fatigue, and headache. Conclusion CHIKV VLP vaccine is the only VLP-based vaccine in clinical development for active immunization against CHIKV disease. Results demonstrate that CHIKV VLP vaccine induces a rapid and robust immune response in most people by Day 15 and through Day 183. These findings support the potential of this VLP-based vaccine to help protect individuals 12 years and older from CHIKV. Disclosures Jason S. Richardson, PhD, Bavarian Nordic Canada Inc: Stocks/Bonds Debbie Anderson, MS, Bavarian Nordic: Employee|Emergent BioSolutions: Stocks/Bonds Sufia Muhammad, MD, Bavarian Nordic: Employee|Emergent BioSolutions: Stocks/Bonds Lauren Tindale, PhD, Bavarian Nordic: Employee Tobi Loreth, n/a, Emergent BioSolutions: Stocks/Bonds Sarah Royalty Tredo, MBA, Emergent Biosolutions: Employee|Emergent Biosolutions: Stocks/Bonds Victoria Jenkins, PhD, Bavarian Nordic: Employee Patrick Ajiboye, MD, Bavarian Nordic: Employee|Emergent BioSolutions: Stocks/Bonds Lisa Bedell, Director Biostatistic, Bavarian-Nordic: Advisor/Consultant|Emergent BioSolutions: Employee|Emergent BioSolutions: Stocks/Bonds

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.312
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicMosquito-borne diseases and controlFrench-language works237,207