MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389230336 · doi:10.1182/blood-2023-185068

Lipid Nanoparticle-Mediated Gene Editing of Human Primary T Cells and Off-Target Analysis of the CRISPR-Cas9 Indels

2023· article· en· W4389230336 on OpenAlexaff
Reka Geczy, Bernice Thommandru, M. S. Swaminathan, Krystal Tan, Kevin Low, Aruna D. Balgi, Stella Park, E. Watt, Vaughn Thada, Garrett R. Rettig, Angela Zhang, Rolf Turk, Samuel Clarke

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Canadian institutionsPrecision Nanosystems (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCRISPRCas9Genome editingElectroporationBiologyComputational biologyMolecular biologyGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Aims: The CRISPR/Cas9 system has emerged as a powerful tool for gene editing of primary cells. In our previous work, we demonstrated a novel lipid nanoparticle (LNP) reagent for the multi-step engineering of gene-edited CAR T cells. We showed high cell viabilities and potent CAR-T mediated killing, even after multiple genetic manipulations. Here, we extend this work by assessing potential off-target editing effects in both LNP-treated T cells and T-cells where the CRISPR reagents were delivered by electroporation. Further, we evaluated multiple Cas9 variants and guide RNA targets. Methods: LNPs encapsulating wild type or high fidelity S.p. Cas9 mRNA and various TRAC and CD52 targeted guide RNAs (sgRNAs) were produced using our scalable NanoAssemblrTM microfluidics platform. Concurrently, electroporation was performed to deliver equivalent cargoes. Purified primary T cells were cultured, activated, and expanded in serum-free media in plates, flasks, or small bioreactors. The LNPs were added to cells by direct addition for gene editing. Gene expression and cell viability were measured using flow cytometry or colorimetric assays. Multi-target performance of CRISPR-Cas9 editing was evaluated through rhAmpSeq-based targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) and indels analyzed for with CRISPRAltRations. Results: TCR or CD52 targeted Cas9 mRNA-LNP addition or electroporation yielded high single and double knockout efficiencies. High-throughput NGS analysis showed strong agreeance to flow cytometry for on-target analysis. We tested a range of sgRNA targets, wild-type and high-fidelity Cas9 mRNAs, and determined off-target editing for all targets and variants investigated. Similar results were obtained when comparing different LNP batch sizes (micro to milligram RNA) and cell culture vessels (0.1 to 45 million cells), demonstrating scalability of both LNP production and cell treatment. Conclusions: The results from this study further support the utility RNA-LNPs for the genetic engineering of primary T cells. The simple and gentle nature of LNP cell treatment allows for multiple genetic engineering steps for simultaneous expression and deletion of proteins for the next cell therapies. These LNPs can be easily manufactured from small-scale screening of RNA libraries to rapid scale-up for clinical translation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicCRISPR and Genetic EngineeringFrench-language works237,207