MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389527364 · doi:10.1898/nwn22-21

AMERICAN AVOCETS AT COOKING LAKE, ALBERTA, 2009–2023, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO LARGE AGGREGATION SIZE, LOW REPRODUCTION RATE, LATE MIGRATION DEPARTURE, AND EFFECTIVE PREDATOR AVOIDANCE

2023· article· en· W4389527364 on OpenAlexaffabout
Dick Dekker

Bibliographic record

VenueNorthwestern Naturalist · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEcology and biodiversity studies
Canadian institutionsAlberta Environment and Protected Areas
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPredatorReproductionEnvironmental scienceGeographyEcologyBiologyPredation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The American Avocet (Recurvirostra americana) is a striking black-and-white shorebird that occurs seasonally in southern Canada from British Columbia to western Ontario. Its northern limit in Alberta is near the latitude of Edmonton, and its typical preferred habitat is lakes similar to Beaverhills Lake, a Ramsar wetland 60 km east of Edmonton. In 2009, after 45 y of field studies of shorebirds and their avian predators at Beaverhills Lake, I switched study locations to Cooking Lake. From 2009 to 2023, I walked a seasonal bird survey along a 3–5-km section of Cooking Lake shores. The spring arrival of Avocets coincided with the first open water, and they stayed at the lake until late October, 3–4 wk after the latest date recorded in provincial handbooks. Avocet reproduction at Cooking Lake was presumed to be limited by the scarcity of island nesting habitat. Non-nesting aggregations were estimated at a maximum of 6000 birds. Foraging and roosting flocks were monitored for interactions with raptors, but in 60 y of walking the shores of both Alberta lakes, I have never seen an avian raptor seize an Avocet, nor did I find any plucked remains of Avocets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.632
Threshold uncertainty score0.906

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNorthwestern NaturalistSame topicEcology and biodiversity studiesFrench-language works237,207