MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 17091: ARO-APOC3, an Investigational RNAi Therapeutic, Silences APOC3 and Reduces Atherosclerosis-Associated Lipoproteins in Patients With Mixed Dyslipidemia: MUIR Study Results

2023· article· en· W4389957014 on OpenAlexaff
Szilárd Vasas, Masoud Azizad, Peter Clifton, Daniel Gaudet, Ronald Goldenberg, Karen Modesto, Ting Chang, Stacey Melquist, Ran Fu, Javier San Martín, Christie M. Ballantyne

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Canadian institutionsThornhill Medical (Canada)Université de MontréalUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDyslipidemiaInternal medicineApolipoprotein BCholesterolEndocrinologyPlaceboTriglycerideVery low-density lipoproteinHypertriglyceridemiaLipoproteinObesityPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Despite the availability of potent LDL-C-lowering therapies, patients with mixed dyslipidemia (MD) remain at high risk of cardiovascular (CV) disease due to residual risk from triglyceride (TG)-rich atherogenic lipoproteins (TRLs), ie, remnant cholesterol and/or VLDL-C. Inhibition of APOC3 has emerged as a promising therapeutic strategy for reducing this residual CV risk. Aim: We report interim results through Week 24 from MUIR, an ongoing, randomized, placebo-controlled, Phase 2b study (NCT04998201) evaluating the effects of ARO-APOC3 in patients with MD (fasting TGs 150 to 499 mg/dL and either LDL-C ≥70 mg/dL or non-HDL-C ≥100 mg/dL). Methods: Eligible subjects (n=353) were randomized 3:1 to receive either subcutaneous injections of 10, 25, or 50 mg ARO-APOC3 or matched placebo on Day 1 and at Week 12 or 50 mg ARO-APOC3 on Day 1 and Week 24. Subjects were on a stable diet and optimal lipid-lowering therapies. The primary endpoint was the percent change from baseline in fasting TGs at Week 24. Statistically significant differences were determined using mixed model repeat measures analysis. Results: At Week 24, when dosed on Day 1 and Week 12, ARO-APOC3 significantly decreased APOC3 in a dose-dependent manner up to 80% (p<0.0001). Least squares (LS) mean TGs were significantly reduced by 52 to 64% (p<0.0001). Least squares (LS) mean atherogenic lipoproteins were reduced by up to 27% for non-HDL-C, 19% for apolipoprotein B, and 55% for remnant cholesterol. LS mean HDL-C was increased by up to 51%. The most frequent adverse events were COVID-19 infection, worsening of glycemic control, and upper respiratory infection. Conclusions: By silencing APOC3 expression, ARO-APOC3 significantly reduced circulating TGs and atherogenic TRLs in patients with MD. The effect of ARO-APOC3 on CV relative risk reduction will be evaluated in an upcoming outcomes trial.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicLipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health→French-language works237,207→