MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4390194925 · doi:10.1002/alz.079855

CSF total tau is more closely associated with synaptic dysfunction than overt neurodegeneration

2023· article· en· W4390194925 on OpenAlexaffabout
Carolina Soares, Bruna Bellaver, Pâmela C.L. Ferreira, Guilherme Povala, Cristiano Schaffer Aguzzoli, João Pedro Ferrari‐Souza, Hussein Zalzale, Firoza Z Lussier, Francieli Rohden, Sarah Abbas, Peter Charles Lemaire, Douglas Teixeira Leffa, Arlec Cabrera, Joseph Therriault, Andréa Lessa Benedet, Cécile Tissot, Stijn Servaes, Arthur C. Macedo, Marie Vermeiren, Gleb Bezgin, Min Su Kang, Jenna Stevenson, Nesrine Rahmouni, Vanessa Pallen, Annie Cohen, Oscar L. López, Dana Tudorascu, William E. Klunk, Victor L. Villemagne, Jean‐Paul Soucy, Serge Gauthier, Diogo O. Souza, Thomas K. Karikari, Nicholas J. Ashton, Henrik Zetterberg, Kaj Blennow, Pedro Rosa‐Neto, Eduardo R. Zimmer, Tharick A. Pascoal

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsMontreal Neurological Institute and HospitalUniversity of TorontoMcGill University Health CentreSunnybrook Health Science CentreDouglas Mental Health University InstituteMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeurodegenerationBinding potentialInternal medicineStandardized uptake valueMagnetic resonance imagingPsychologyMedicineCognitive declineHippocampal formationNeuroscienceOncologyPositron emission tomographyEndocrinologyPathologyDementiaDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background CSF total tau (t‐tau) is postulated as a marker of neuronal degeneration in the ATN criteria. Here, we hypothesize that CSF t‐tau is more closely related to synaptic loss than over neurodegeneration. Method We evaluated 128 older individuals (75 CU,33 MCI,20 AD) in the TRIAD cohort (McGill, Canada) with CSF t‐tau, SNAP25long and Neurofilament Light (NfL), Amyloid‐beta (Aβ) positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, and clinical assessments. We used increased SNAP25long as an index of synaptic dysfunction (S+) and reduced hippocampal volume as neurodegeneration (N+). S and N positivity were determined using a cutoff anchored in young CU individuals. Linear regression models were used to test the association between CSF t‐tau, SNAP25long and NfL levels and hippocampal volume, adjusted for age, sex, and cognitive status. ANCOVA was employed to inspect CSF t‐tau levels across the groups 1) S‐N‐; 2) S+N‐; 3) S‐N+; 4) S+N+, adjusted for age, sex, cognitive status, and Aβ burden. Result We found that a model with the addition of SNAP25long to the covariates explained 65% of the variance (p‐value<0.0001) of CSF t‐tau. Alternatively, hippocampal volume (R2 = 0.2187; p‐value<0.0001) and NfL (R2 = 0.3671; p‐value<0.0001) alone or in combination explained less than 40% of the variance of CSF t‐tau (R2 = 0.3597; p‐value<0.0001) (Figure 1). Interestingly, we observed an increase of CSF t‐tau in the S+N‐ group but not in the S‐N+, further supporting that CSF t‐tau is abnormal in the presence of synaptic dysfunction rather than neurodegeneration. Additionally, Loess regression lines confirm a larger magnitude of change of synaptic dysfunction as a function of t‐tau, compared with neurodegeneration (Figure 3). Conclusion Our results suggest that CSF t‐tau may reflect synaptic loss rather than neuronal degeneration. This has implications for the interpretability of results obtained with CSF t‐tau in biomarker studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research→French-language works237,207→