SUMOylation impact on synaptotoxicity of tau oligomers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Tau oligomers (oTau) secreted by neurons and astrocytes are linked to the propagation of pathology and negatively affect neuronal activity and viability. oTau‐mediated synaptic loss leads to cognitive deficits and manifests the clinical outcomes of Alzheimer’s disease and related tauopathies. Small Ubiquitin‐like MOdifier (SUMO) proteins regulate multiple cellular events and SUMOylation plays pivotal roles in synaptic biology. Changes in SUMO conjugation and function are also linked to AD and related neurodegenerative disorders such as Huntington’s and Parkinson’s disease. The goal of this investigation is to determine the impact of the two main SUMO isoforms, SUMO1 and SUMO2, on oTau related synaptotoxicity. Method SUMO1 and SUMO2 transgenic mice were generated with expression regulated by the neuron‐specific prion cos‐tet promoter. These in vivo models were used to generate double transgenic mice expressing human SUMO proteins and P301S mutant Tau. Changes in synaptic density and activity and the effects of oTau pathology were investigated with respect to cognitive deficits and long term potentiation (LTP). Result Elevated expression of human SUMO1 lead to impaired synaptic development and increased tau aggregation. SUMO1 transgenics crossed to Tau mutant mice resulted in an accelerated synaptic loss and a more severe disease phenotype as evidenced by LTP impairments and rapid cognitive decline. Conversely, SUMO2 conjugation levels were decreased in the presence of oTau and phospho‐tau pathology indicating a down‐regulation of its function. Enhanced SUMO2 expression in a mouse model of Tau pathology reversed this process and resulted in a significant reduction in oTau‐mediated synaptotoxicity and the associated LTP and cognitive impairments. Conclusion Cumulatively, our findings indicate that SUMO1 negative impacts and exacerbates oTau‐related synaptic dysfunction. In contrast, SUMO2 confers substantial neuroprotection and represents a potential therapeutic avenue to counteract oTau‐induced synaptotoxicity in AD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".