MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390201620 · doi:10.1002/alz.082650

Interim phase 1 part A results for ALN‐APP, the first investigational RNAi therapeutic in development for Alzheimer’s disease

2023· article· en· W4390201620 on OpenAlexaff
Sharon Cohen, Simon Ducharme, Jared R. Brosch, Everard G.B. Vijverberg, Liana G. Apostolova, Alexandre Sostelly, S Goteti, Nune Makarova, Andreja Avberšek, Weinong Guo, Bret L. Bostwick, Catherine J. Mummery

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityDouglas Mental Health University InstituteToronto Public Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTolerabilityMedicineCohortPharmacodynamicsInternal medicinePlaceboClinical Dementia RatingClinical endpointDementiaAmyloid precursor proteinAlzheimer's diseasePharmacologyOncologyClinical trialPharmacokineticsDiseaseAdverse effectPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: . ALN-APP is an investigational intrathecally (IT) administered RNAi therapeutic designed to reduce upstream intracellular and extracellular amyloid precursor protein (APP) levels by lowering APP mRNA. As a result, we hypothesize that ALN-APP may alter the cascade of events that result in neurodegeneration, potentially slowing, halting, or reversing Alzheimer's disease progression. METHOD: ALN-APP-001 (NCT05231785) Part A is an ongoing randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase 1 single-ascending dose study in patients with EOAD. Patients are required to have disease onset at age <65 years, Clinical Dementia Rating® global score of 0.5 or 1.0, and Mini Mental State Examination score >20. Patients are being evaluated over 6 months, with further follow-up of up to 6 months as needed. The primary endpoint is the safety and tolerability of ALN-APP. Secondary objectives include the evaluation of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic effects of ALN-APP. RESULT: 12 patients were enrolled and randomized 2:1 to receive ALN-APP or placebo in 25mg and 75mg dose cohorts. Baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. Mean (SD) duration on study was 6.7 (1.7) months for cohort 1 (25mg) and 2.0 (1.0) months for cohort 2 (75mg). Dose-dependent reductions of soluble APPα and APPβ (sAPPα and sAPPβ) levels in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) at day 15 were observed following a single dose of ALN-APP, with mean reductions from baseline of 55% (sAPPα) and 69% (sAPPβ), and maximum reductions of 71% (sAPPα) and 83% (sAPPβ) in the 75mg cohort (n = 4) (Table 2). All adverse events (AEs) by data cut-off on 01/17/2023 were mild or moderate (Table 3), with no AEs deemed related to study drug by the investigators. Additional cohort data will be presented at the meeting. CONCLUSION: This first clinical study of a CNS-administered RNAi therapeutic demonstrates target engagement of APP, with reductions in CSF sAPPα and sAPPβ. To date, ALN-APP remains generally well tolerated with all reported AEs mild or moderate. These interim results support further evaluation of ALN-APP in patients with EOAD. Reference: 1. Hampel H et al. Molecular Psychiatry (2021). 26:5481-5503.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.101

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.128
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & DementiaSame topicAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207