Management and Amelioration of Knee Joint Osteoarthritis in Adults Using a Novel High-Functional Bovine Collagen Peptide as a Nutritional Therapy: A Double-Blind, Prospective, Multicentric, Randomized, Active and Placebo Controlled, Five-Arm, Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective The various functionalities of collagen peptides have generated a large interest in utilizing the bioactive peptides as a nutritional therapy to ameliorate various physiological degenerative conditions. Collagen peptides are observed to reduce the pain and aligned difficulties with respect to osteoarthritis. Here we report the enhanced ameliorating property of novel high-functional “Wellnex” Type J collagen peptides following a double-blind randomized active and placebo-controlled 5-arm clinical trial ( n = 100) by using it as a nutritional supplement in subjects with knee joint osteoarthritis in comparison with conventional bovine collagen peptides. The efficacy, safety, and tolerability were also studied. Design Dosages of 2.5, 5.0, and 10.0 g of high-functional Type J bovine collagen peptides, 10.0 g of conventional collagen peptides, and 10.0 g of placebo were given to the 5 groups for a period of 90 days. The Western Ontario McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) score, Pain Scale, Quality of Life (QoL), Physician’s Impression of change Score (PICS), serum C-terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type II collagen (CTX-II) levels and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Osteoarthritis Knee Score (MOAKS) parameters were monitored. Results Type J 2.5 g showed significant improvement in WOMAC, QoL, CTX, and MOAKS and observed to be equivalent to conventional collagen peptide 10-g supplementation in terms of efficacy. Conclusion The two significant outcomes of the study were that Type J 10.0 g, Type J 5.0 g, Type J 2.5 g and conventional collagen peptides 10.0 g supplementation were observed to be beneficial nutraceutical therapies for knee joint osteoarthritis, and Type J 2.5 g supplementation was equivalent to conventional collagen peptides 10.0-g supplementation in terms of efficacy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".