MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391131096 · doi:10.3233/jpd-230117

Delivering Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation Care in Parkinson’s Disease: An International Consensus Statement

2024· article· en· W4391131096 on OpenAlexaff
Jennifer G. Goldman, Daniele Volpe, Terry D. Ellis, Mark A. Hirsch, Julia Johnson, Julia T. Wood, Ana Vinagre‐Aragón, Roberta Biundo, Alessandro Di Rocco, Glenn S. Kasman, Robert Iansek, Janis M. Miyasaki, Victor M. McConvey, Marten Munneke, Serge Pinto, Karen A. St. Clair, Santiago D. Toledo, Michele K. York, Ronnie Todaro, Nicole Yarab, Kristin Wallock

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Parkinson s Disease · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsCentre for Movement DisordersUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRehabilitationMedicinePsychological interventionMultidisciplinary approachQuality of life (healthcare)DiseaseOccupational therapyParkinson's diseaseSystematic reviewPhysical medicine and rehabilitationPhysical therapyMEDLINEPsychologyNursingPathologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Parkinson's disease (PD) is a complex neurodegenerative disorder impacting everyday function and quality of life. Rehabilitation plays a crucial role in improving symptoms, function, and quality of life and reducing disability, particularly given the lack of disease-modifying agents and limitations of medications and surgical therapies. However, rehabilitative care is under-recognized and under-utilized in PD and often only utilized in later disease stages, despite research and guidelines demonstrating its positive effects. Currently, there is a lack of consensus regarding fundamental topics related to rehabilitative services in PD. OBJECTIVE: The goal of the international Parkinson's Foundation Rehabilitation Medicine Task Force was to develop a consensus statement regarding the incorporation of rehabilitation in PD care. METHODS: The Task Force, comprised of international multidisciplinary experts in PD and rehabilitation and people directly affected by PD, met virtually to discuss topics such as rehabilitative services, existing therapy guidelines and rehabilitation literature in PD, and gaps and needs. A systematic, interactive, and iterative process was used to develop consensus-based statements on core components of PD rehabilitation and discipline-specific interventions. RESULTS: The expert-based consensus statement outlines key tenets of rehabilitative care including its multidisciplinary approach and discipline-specific guidance for occupational therapy, physical therapy, speech language pathology/therapy, and psychology/neuropsychology across all PD stages. CONCLUSIONS: Rehabilitative interventions should be an essential component in the comprehensive treatment of PD, from diagnosis to advanced disease. Greater education and awareness of the benefits of rehabilitative services for people with PD and their care partners, and further evidence-based and scientific study are encouraged.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.218
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.182
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.218
Threshold uncertainty score0.964

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.2180.182
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.008
Bibliometrics0.0080.007
Science and technology studies0.0060.005
Scholarly communication0.0080.007
Open science0.0110.016
Research integrity0.0170.017
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations71
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Parkinson s DiseaseSame topicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207