Organic-soluble cytosine derivatives for studying base-pair interactions in nonaqueous solution
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The presence of higher order G-quadruplex-DNA (G4) structures in human cells in guanine-rich DNA sequences has been well established. In cases of G4 helicase impairment or G4 stabilization via association with G4 ligands, it has been determined that arrest and/or termination of DNA transcription/replication occurs because these structures act as physical barriers to both helicase and polymerase mobility along the DNA. Truncation of transcription or replication may result in the loss of genetic material expression leading to disorders. To ameliorate G4-induced barriers, agents that destabilize or “unwind” the quadraplex structures are sought. Earlier work has shown that the cytosine analogue phenylpyrrolocytosine has potential G4-destabilizing ability. It was hypothesized that the unwinding activity was related to its ability to base pair with guanosine. To facilitate the design and evaluation of the hydrogen bonding ability of cytosine analogues, solubility in aprotic, and low-polarity solvents, e.g., deutero-chloroform (CDCl3), is needed; then, determination of association constants ( Ka) with guanine via 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy or isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) will be possible. Herein, we report on the synthesis of three new chloroform-soluble, cytosine analogues: N1-cyclohexylmethyl-7-phenylimidazolocytosine, N1-cyclohexylmethyl-7-(6-(methoxycarbonyl)pyridin-2-yl)imidazolocytosine, and N1-cyclohexylmethyl-7-(6-carbamoylpyridin-2-yl)imidazolocytosine. We further report the binding interactions of each of these analogues with the guanosine derivative 2′,3′,5′- O-tris( tert-butyldimethylsilyl)guanosine through the use of both ITC and 1H NMR titration experiments in chloroform and compare the binding to persilyated ribo-cytidine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".