UTILIZATION OF SOCIAL MEDIA AS A QUARTER LIFE CRISIS EDUCATION MEDIA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction : Quarter life crisis is an individual's response to moving towards the reality of life in which there is instability, continuous change, various choices and the emergence of panic due to feeling helpless. Life changes like this are accompanied by the emergence of various kinds of emotional reactions such as anxiety, panic, stress, and confusion about goals, as well as doubts about one's own abilities and fear of failure. Methods: in utilizing social media, using qualitative methods, which include collecting data by interviews and delivering material. Purpose: to take an approach involving visual narratives, interviews, and practical solutions in providing a comprehensive view of the quarter life crisis and providing positive value in using social media and having a good impact on oneself. Results: The author's video has its own interest among Instagram users, as evidenced by the author's video views reaching 3,753 and video likes reaching 89 likes. This shows that Instagram users gain knowledge about the quarter life crisis. Conclusion: Currently there are still students who experience changes in emotional reactions such as anxiety, panic, stress, and confusion and doubt about their own abilities. Video about the quarter life crisis by conducting interviews with students to get various perspectives on the quarter life crisis and strategies for dealing with it. The video content will be disseminated via social media such as Instagram.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".