MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4391448299 · doi:10.1161/str.55.suppl_1.wp13

Abstract WP13: Derivation and Validation of Utility Weights for the Modified Rankin Scale From the AcT Thrombolysis Trial

2024· article· en· W4391448299 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ayooluwanimi Okikiolu, Olayinka I. Arimoro, Nishita Singh, Fouzi Bala, Ayoola Ademola, Mohammed Almekhlafi, Aravind Ganesh, Brian Buck, Richard H. Swartz, Michael D. Hill, Bijoy K. Menon, Tolulope T. Sajobi

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook Health Science CentreFoothills Medical CentreUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineModified Rankin ScaleThrombolysisDerivationScale (ratio)Internal medicineIschemic strokeCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Utility-weighted mRS (UW-mRS) is increasingly being adopted as an important clinical endpoint in stroke trials as it offers some gains in statistical efficiency and power when estimating treatment effects. The widely used utility weights for estimating UW-mRS, derived from a systematic review of acute stroke trials, are prone to substantial variability across and between mRS categories. This study aims to derive utility weights for UW-mRS by directly mapping 5-item EuroQoL (EQ-5D-5L) responses to mRS scores. Methods: Data were collected from all patients included in Alteplase compared to Tenecteplase (AcT) trial. Quality of life at 90 days post-randomization was assessed using EQ-5D-5L. Health utilities (EQ-5D index) were estimated using the time trade-off approach based on Canadian norms and imputed as zero for patients who died. Using a predictive linear model, utility weights were derived by regressing the ordinal mRS on the utilities. Model performance was measured using R 2 and root mean square error (RMSE) after 5-fold cross-validation. We compared the distribution of the UW-mRS scores using the systematic review and model-based weights. Results: Of the 1503 acute stroke patients who completed the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire at 90 days, 717 (47.7%) were female, and the median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 74.0 (20.0). The median (IQR) estimated health utility was 0.81 (0.52). The utility weights for mRS categories 0-6 were 0.93, 0.90, 0.80, 0.67, 0.41, 0.24, and 0.00. The model performed well after 5-fold cross-validation (R 2 = 0.89; RMSE = 0.12). The model-based weights had higher mean and median UW-mRS scores but smaller variability across mRS levels than those from the systematic review-based weights. There was no statistically significant difference in the median UW-mRS scores across both treatment groups for each utility weight type. Conclusion: The estimation of UW-mRS scores largely depends on the choice of weights used, which depends on sample heterogeneity in treatment interventions and stroke severity of the cohorts. Model-based approaches result in reduced variability between and across mRS levels. Future research will seek to validate these utility weights externally in an independent cohort of patients with stroke.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.224
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.478
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.224
Threshold uncertainty score0.957

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.2240.478
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.010
Bibliometrics0.0060.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management→French-language works237,207→