MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391543041 · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2024.149391

Electrochemical and scanning transmission X-ray microscopy studies of MnO2 and Mn3O4 for supercapacitor cathodes: Influence of fabrication method and electrochemical activation on charge storage

2024· article· en· W4391543041 on OpenAlex
Wenjuan Yang, Haytham Eraky, Chunyang Zhang, Adam P. Hitchcock, Igor Zhitomirsky

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Engineering Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchChina Scholarship CouncilVetenskapsrådetGovernment of SaskatchewanVINNOVASvenska Forskningsrådet FormasNational Research Council CanadaCanada Foundation for InnovationUniversity of Saskatchewan
KeywordsElectrochemistrySupercapacitorCapacitanceCyclic voltammetryHorizontal scan rateMaterials scienceChemical engineeringElectrodeAnalytical Chemistry (journal)NanotechnologyChemistryChromatographyPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This investigation is motivated by increasing interest in Mn3O4 as a promising alternative to MnO2 for supercapacitors with high active mass and the need for better understanding of charging and electrode activation mechanisms. High energy ball milling (HEBM) of chemically precipitated MnO2 and Mn3O4 in the presence of quercetin resulted in significant capacitance increase. The use of Mn2+ salts for Mn3O4 synthesis facilitated the application of quercetin as a new chelating capping agent for synthesis of Mn3O4, which showed higher capacitance, compared to HEBM Mn3O4. The capacitance of Mn3O4 prepared using quercetin was 6.0F cm−2 (149.50 F g−1) for cyclic voltammetry at 2 mVs−1 and 8.03 F cm−2 (200.93 F g−1) for chronopotentiometry at 3 mA cm−2, which is on-par with the capacitance of MnO2. The time-consuming activation procedure, which limits Mn3O4 applications, was significantly accelerated for HEBM Mn3O4 and practically eliminated for Mn3O4 prepared using quercetin as a capping agent. Soft X-ray scanning transmission X-ray microscopy (STXM), an advanced synchrotron based analytical microscopy, was used at the O 1s and Mn 2p edges to identify and quantitatively map the Mn oxidation states present in Mn3O4 materials. Variable and fixed sweep rate electrochemical cycling procedures were used for the analysis of oxidation state of Mn and charging mechanism using STXM analysis coupled with electrochemical testing. The combination of STXM and electrochemistry provided valuable insights into the activation kinetics and charging mechanism. The STXM results showed that the tested materials contained mixtures of Mn2+, Mn3+ and Mn4+ oxides. A small amount of MnO phase in the tested samples indicated partial reduction. The higher content of MnO2 phase in the tested Mn3O4 prepared using quercetin as a capping agent, compared to HEBM Mn3O4, correlated with higher capacitance and the ability to eliminate the activation procedure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.309
Threshold uncertainty score0.543

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it