MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391740793 · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ad2892

Inequalities in urban air pollution in sub-Saharan Africa: an empirical modeling of ambient NO and NO<sub>2</sub> concentrations in Accra, Ghana

2024· article· en· W4391740793 on OpenAlexaff
Jiayuan Wang, Abosede S. Alli, Sierra Clark, Majid Ezzati, Michael Bräuer, Allison Hughes, James Nimo, Josephine Bedford-Moses, Solomon Baah, Ricky Nathvani, Dhanraj Vishwanath, Samuel Agyei‐Mensah, Jill Baumgartner, James E. Bennett, Raphael E. Arku

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Research Letters · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreMcGill UniversityUniversity of British Columbia
FundersMedical Research CouncilUniversity of GhanaWellcome Trust
KeywordsAir pollutionEnvironmental sciencePollutionGeographyInequalityEnvironmental protectionMathematicsEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Road traffic has become the leading source of air pollution in fast-growing sub-Saharan African cities. Yet, there is a dearth of robust city-wide data for understanding space-time variations and inequalities in combustion related emissions and exposures. We combined nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ) and nitric oxide (NO) measurement data from 134 locations in the Greater Accra Metropolitan Area (GAMA), with geographical, meteorological, and population factors in spatio-temporal mixed effects models to predict NO 2 and NO concentrations at fine spatial (50 m) and temporal (weekly) resolution over the entire GAMA. Model performance was evaluated with 10-fold cross-validation (CV), and predictions were summarized as annual and seasonal (dusty [Harmattan] and rainy [non-Harmattan]) mean concentrations. The predictions were used to examine population distributions of, and socioeconomic inequalities in, exposure at the census enumeration area (EA) level. The models explained 88% and 79% of the spatiotemporal variability in NO 2 and NO concentrations, respectively. The mean predicted annual, non-Harmattan and Harmattan NO 2 levels were 37 (range: 1–189), 28 (range: 1–170) and 50 (range: 1–195) µ g m −3 , respectively. Unlike NO 2 , NO concentrations were highest in the non-Harmattan season (41 [range: 31–521] µ g m −3 ). Road traffic was the dominant factor for both pollutants, but NO 2 had higher spatial heterogeneity than NO. For both pollutants, the levels were substantially higher in the city core, where the entire population (100%) was exposed to annual NO 2 levels exceeding the World Health Organization (WHO) guideline of 10 µ g m −3 . Significant disparities in NO 2 concentrations existed across socioeconomic gradients, with residents in the poorest communities exposed to levels about 15 µ g m −3 higher compared with the wealthiest ( p &lt; 0.001). The results showed the important role of road traffic emissions in air pollution concentrations in the GAMA, which has major implications for the health of the city’s poorest residents. These data could support climate and health impact assessments as well as policy evaluations in the city.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.685
Threshold uncertainty score0.721

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Research LettersSame topicAir Quality and Health ImpactsFrench-language works237,207