A Phase II Study Integrating a Single-Blind Safety Phase with a Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Randomized Phase, Assessing Single-Dose Intramuscular or Intranasal Administration to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of the Recombinant Vaccine Against COVID-19 (AVX/COVID-12 “Patria”) Based on an Active Newcastle Disease Viral Vector as a Heterologous Booster in Subjects with Evidence of Previous Immunity to SARS-CoV-2
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background The global inequity in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine distribution, primarily affecting low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), highlights the urgent need for innovative and cost-effective vaccine technologies to address availability disparities. This is crucial for achieving and sustaining widespread immunity and protecting vulnerable populations during future booster campaigns. Methods To address this need, we conducted a phase II clinical trial evaluating the safety and immunogenicity of the AVX/COVID-12 “Patria” vaccine as a booster dose. The vaccine was administered through both intramuscular (IM) and intranasal (IN) routes to participants who had previously received severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines based on adenoviral technology, inactivated virus, or mRNA technology. The inclusion criterion involved individuals with initial anti-spike IgG titers below 1,200 U/mL, allowing observation of the booster effect induced by vaccination. Results Immunization with AVX/COVID-12 resulted in a significant (>2.5 times) increase in neutralizing antibodies against the original Wuhan strain and variants of concern (VOCs) such as Alpha, Beta, Delta, and Omicron (BA.2 and BA.5). This immune response was accompanied by cellular interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) production, indicating a robust and multifaceted reaction. Conclusions The administration of AVX/COVID-12 as a booster dose, whether through IM or IN routes, was safe and well-tolerated. The vaccine extended immune responses not only against the original Wuhan-1 strain but also against various VOCs. Its ability to enhance preexisting immune responses suggests a potential contribution to expanding and sustaining herd immunity within the population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".