A13 MICROBIOTA FROM PATIENTS WITH INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE (IBD) INDUCE ALTERED BEHAVIOUR AND VISCERAL HYPERSENSITIVITY IN MICROBIOTA-HUMANIZED MICE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background IBD is characterized by relapsing episodes of tissue-damaging inflammation in the gastrointestinal tract. Abdominal pain is common in IBD and often persists in the absence of overt inflammation. The treatment has limited efficacy, in part due to our partial understanding of its pathophysiology, and thus commonly leads to dependency on opioids. Moreover, patients with IBD are more likely to develop psychiatric comorbidities (anxiety and depression), further impairing the disease course and quality of life. The gut microbiota has been shown to modulate pain, mood, and anxiety. Gut bacterial composition and function are altered in patients with IBD. However, whether IBD microbiota affects pain perception and emotional behaviour is unknown. Aims To determine whether microbiota from patients with IBD contributes to visceral hypersensitivity and behavioural abnormalities in a microbiota-humanized mouse model. Methods Adult germ-free C57BL/6 mice (n=65) of both sexes were colonized with fecal microbiota from 7 patients with IBD (Crohn’s Disease n=5, Ulcerative Colitis n=2) and 3 healthy controls (HC). Mice were fed with a human-like (Western) diet. Behavioural tests (light preference, open field, and tail suspension tests) were employed to assess anxiety- and depression-like behaviour. Visceral sensitivity was assessed by measuring visceromotor responses to colorectal distension. Results Compared to mice with HC microbiota, mice with IBD microbiota had reduced body weight gain. However, no differences in colon length were found, suggesting that IBD microbiota did not induce overt colonic inflammation. Mice with IBD microbiota displayed a reduced preference for the light chamber and increased immobility in the tail suspension test compared to HC mice, suggestive of anxiety- and depression-like behaviour, respectively. Importantly, no differences in overall locomotion were observed, thus ruling out sickness-like behaviour. When subjected to colorectal distension, mice with IBD microbiota had an overall higher visceromotor response (area under the curve) compared to HC mice. Furthermore, they displayed increased responses to non-noxious stimuli (100 μL distension), suggestive of visceral allodynia. Conclusions Our data demonstrate that microbiota from patients with IBD negatively affects the gut-brain axis, by inducing changes in emotionality-related behaviour and triggering visceral hypersensitivity. Uncovering the microbial products and molecular mechanisms underlying these abnormalities will guide the development of novel microbiota-based therapies for patients with IBD. Funding Agencies CCC, CIHRCrohn's and Colitis Foundation (USA)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".