MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392169314 · doi:10.1002/cctc.202400182

An Overview of Syntheses of Salvinorin A and its Analogues

2024· article· en· W4392169314 on OpenAlexaff
Soufian Tibouti, Louis Barriault

Bibliographic record

VenueChemCatChem · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicChemical synthesis and alkaloids
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryκ-opioid receptorHallucinogenStereochemistryCombinatorial chemistryAgonistReceptorBiologyPharmacology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Salvinorin A is a powerful hallucinogen in humans, and a selective, high efficacy agonist of the kappa‐opioid receptor (κ‐OR). Salvinorin A is the first plant‐derived ligand with high selectivity for κ‐OR over other receptors, its structure is unrelated to any known opioid receptor ligands, even lacking any nitrogenous moieties. Mechanistically and pharmacologically, salvinorin A is distinct from other known hallucinogens in humans, making it the only selective κ‐OR ligand to gain wide‐spread interest outside of research. Structurally, salvinorin A bares a highly functionalized trans‐decalin core, containing two quaternary centers, and is fused to a δ‐lactone baring a furan moiety. Synthetic access of salvinorin A has been elusive due to a highly sensitive epimerizable center at carbon 8 (C8). All these features make salvinorin A a highly challenging synthetic target. With multiple synthetic efforts from around the world, only nine completed syntheses have been achieved to date. This review is intended to provide a look at the key strategies used to achieve the syntheses reported to date. We will summarize the efforts towards the syntheses of salvinorin A starting from Evans in 2007 to Barriault in 2023.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemCatChemSame topicChemical synthesis and alkaloidsFrench-language works237,207