Vector integration and fate in the hemophilia dog liver multiple years after AAV-FVIII gene transfer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT: Gene therapy using adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors is a promising approach for the treatment of monogenic disorders. Long-term multiyear transgene expression has been demonstrated in animal models and clinical studies. Nevertheless, uncertainties remain concerning the nature of AAV vector persistence and whether there is a potential for genotoxicity. Here, we describe the mechanisms of AAV vector persistence in the liver of a severe hemophilia A dog model (male = 4, hemizygous; and female = 4, homozygous), more than a decade after portal vein delivery. The predominant vector form was nonintegrated episomal structures with levels correlating with long-term transgene expression. Random integration was seen in all samples (median frequency, 9.3e-4 sites per cell), with small numbers of nonrandom common integration sites associated with open chromatin. No full-length integrated vectors were found, supporting predominant episomal vector-mediated long-term transgene expression. Despite integration, this was not associated with oncogene upregulation or histopathological evidence of tumorigenesis. These findings support the long-term safety of this therapeutic modality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".