MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392647723 · doi:10.1016/j.focus.2024.100223

Putting Meta-Analysis Findings in Proper Perspective: Comment on “The Effects of Nonpharmaceutical Interventions on COVID-19 Cases, Hospitalizations, and Mortality: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis”

2024· article· en· W4392647723 on OpenAlexaff
Ari R. Joffe, Roy Eappen, Chris Milburn, M Fulford, Neil Rau

Bibliographic record

VenueAJPM Focus · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicMeta-analysis and systematic reviews
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoHamilton General HospitalDalhousie UniversityMcGill UniversityUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeta-analysisPerspective (graphical)Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Psychological interventionMedicine2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSystematic reviewSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)MEDLINEPsychologyInternal medicineComputer scienceBiologyPsychiatryVirologyOutbreak

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Peters and Farhadloo1 concluded that their meta-analysis “found that the nonpharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) studied were associated with reduced rates of cases, hospitalizations, and deaths” during the first coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) wave. We believe that this conclusion was not warranted for 3 reasons.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.062
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.042
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (broad), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.983
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0620.042
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0110.013
Bibliometrics0.0020.009
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.632
GPT teacher head0.562
Teacher spread0.070 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAJPM FocusSame topicMeta-analysis and systematic reviewsFrench-language works237,207