MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394601285 · doi:10.1080/02786826.2024.2316190

Rapid assessment of jet engine-like soot from combustion of conventional and sustainable aviation fuels using flame spray pyrolysis

2024· article· en· W4394601285 on OpenAlex
Jason Scott, Timothy A. Sipkens, Gregory J. Smallwood, Rym Mehri, Joel C. Corbin, Prem Lobo, M. Reza Kholghy

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueAerosol Science and Technology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAdvanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityNational Research Council Canada
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsJet fuelCombustionSootPyrolysisJet (fluid)Environmental scienceWaste managementJet engineAviationAerospace engineeringChemistryEngineeringOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Black carbon, or soot, is one of the highest contributors to global warming. The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) has adopted regulatory standards for soot from aircraft engines, also referred to as a nonvolatile particulate matter (nvPM), to limit or reduce the harmful impacts of nvPM on the environment. Sustainable aviation fuels (SAF) offer advantages to reduce soot emissions and overall environmental impact but require extensive testing and evaluation before wider adoption. Typical measurements of soot produced by combustion of aviation fuels require full-sized jet engines and large volumes of fuel, which can be prohibitively expensive. This study investigates flame spray pyrolysis (FSP) as a simple bench-top tool for comparison of soot emissions from the combustion of different liquid jet fuels. A sampling assembly is designed for soot collection and analysis. Morphological analysis follows from transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image analysis and mobility (differential mobility analyzer) classification. Morphologies are compared to previous measurements from aircraft turbines. Soot agglomerate size distributions and elemental to total carbon ratios (EC/TC) are measured for three liquid fuels and flame conditions with Reynolds numbers and burner equivalence ratios ranging from 6100 to 9100 and 7 to 13, respectively. Day-to-day variations in the dilution ratio resulted in up to 20% variability in the measured total agglomerate number-based concentration and mobility diameter. Geometric mean primary particle and mobility diameter values are below 21 and 104 nm, respectively, in excellent agreement with those emitted from jet engines and prior work using FSP. EC/TC remains >0.75 for most flame conditions and fuels and increases with burner equivalence ratio, but values as low as 0.63 are measured from SAF combustion.Copyright © 2024 American Association for Aerosol Research

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.776

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it