MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394912002 · doi:10.1136/bmjonc-2024-000414

In pursuit of parity: addressing gender disparities in global cancer research

2024· editorial· en· W4394912002 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Kristina Jenei

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ Oncology · 2024
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiversity and Career in Medicine
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsParity (physics)Health equityClinical PracticeMedicinePolitical sciencePsychologyFamily medicineNursingPublic health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research is fundamental for effective cancer treatment to improve patient outcomes worldwide. On one hand, research has driven innovation and delivered treatments that have changed clinical practice for the better. On the other hand, lies concerning disparities. Previous literature outlines the

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.037
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.110
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Incentives · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.975
Threshold uncertainty score0.194

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0370.110
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.005
Bibliometrics0.0060.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.006
Scholarly communication0.0140.012
Open science0.0060.003
Research integrity0.0250.034
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.232
GPT teacher head0.560
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainIncentives
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJ OncologySame topicDiversity and Career in MedicineFrench-language works237,207