MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4394977656 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsae067.0649

0649 Samelisant Improves the Symptoms of Excessive Daytime Sleepiness in Narcolepsy: Results from a Phase-2 Study

2024· article· en· W4394977656 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ramakrishna Nirogi, Jyothsna Ravula, Pradeep Jayarajan, Vinod Goyal, Vijay Benade, Satish Jetta, Anil Shinde, Dhanunjay Dogiparti, Ramkumar Subramanian, Ilayaraja Kalaikadhiban, Venkat Jasti

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicSleep and Wakefulness Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarcolepsyExcessive daytime sleepinessDaytimeMultiple Sleep Latency TestMedicinePsychologyModafinilPsychiatrySleep disorderInsomnia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Narcolepsy is a lifelong sleep disorder characterized by a classic tetrad of excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) with irresistible sleep attacks, cataplexy, hypnagogic hallucination, and sleep paralysis. The currently available treatments suffer from major limitations like side effects, modest efficacy or they must be prescribed in combination. Samelisant (SUVN-G3031) is a potent and selective histamine 3 receptor inverse agonist. In orexin knockout mice, samelisant produced wake-promoting and anticataplectic effects suggesting its potential therapeutic utility in the treatment of narcolepsy. Safety and tolerability studies in animals and healthy human volunteers suggest a favorable risk/benefit profile for samelisant. Methods Samelisant had been evaluated as monotherapy in a Phase-2 proof of concept study in the USA and Canada for the treatment of EDS in patients with narcolepsy (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04072380). Patients diagnosed with narcolepsy as per ICSD-3 criteria, aged between 18 to 65 years with an Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score of ≥12 and mean Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT) time of < 12 min were recruited in the study. A total of 190 patients were randomized into 3 treatment arms (placebo, samelisant 2 mg and samelisant 4 mg) in 1:1:1 ratio and received either placebo or samelisant, once daily for 2 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was change in ESS score from baseline to Day 14. Secondary endpoints were changes from baseline to week 2 in Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) and MWT scores. The medical monitor and the data safety monitoring committee monitored safety throughout the study. Results The baseline characteristics and demographics were consistent with the general narcolepsy population and equally distributed between treatment groups. The study met the pre-specified primary efficacy endpoint. In comparison against placebo, samelisant as monotherapy demonstrated statistically significant (p< 0.024) and clinically meaningful reduction (-2.1 point) in EDS measured by ESS. Samelisant was generally safe and well tolerated. Conclusion Samelisant holds promise as a monotherapy treatment of EDS in narcolepsy. Support (if any)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.519
Threshold uncertainty score0.628

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicSleep and Wakefulness ResearchFrench-language works237,207