<i>Plasmodium knowlesi</i> infection is associated with elevated circulating biomarkers of brain injury and endothelial activation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: has led to a surge in zoonotic malaria cases and deaths in recent years. Signs of cerebral involvement have been observed in a non-comatose, fatal case of severe knowlesi infection, but the potential impact of this malaria species on the brain remains underexplored. To address this gap, we investigated circulating levels of brain injury, inflammation, and vascular biomarkers in a cohort of knowlesi-infected patients and controls. Methods: Archived plasma samples from 19 patients with confirmed symptomatic knowlesi infection and 19 healthy, age-matched controls from Peninsular Malaysia were analysed. A total of 52 plasma biomarkers of brain injury, inflammation, and vascular activation were measured using Luminex and SIMOA assays. Wilcoxon tests were used to examine group differences, and biomarker profiles were explored through hierarchical clustering heatmap analysis. Results: Bonferroni-corrected analyses revealed significantly elevated brain injury biomarker levels in knowlesi-infected patients, including S100B (p<0.0001), Tau (p=0.0007), UCH-L1 (p<0.0001), αSyn (p<0.0001), Park7 (p=0.0006), NRGN (p=0.0022), and TDP-43 (p=0.005). Compared to controls, levels were lower in the infected group for BDNF (p<0.0001), CaBD (p<0.0001), CNTN1 (p<0.0001), NCAM-1 (p<0.0001), GFAP (p=0.0013), and KLK6 (p=0.0126). Hierarchical clustering revealed distinct group profiles for circulating levels of brain injury and vascular activation biomarkers. Conclusions: infection on the brain, with distinct alterations in cerebral injury and endothelial activation biomarker profiles compared to healthy controls. Further studies are warranted to investigate the pathophysiology and clinical significance of these altered surrogate markers, through both neuroimaging and long-term neurocognitive assessments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".