Abstract PO4-13-01: A randomised trial comparing 6-monthly dosing of adjuvant zoledronate with a single one-time dose in patients with early breast cancer (REaCT-ZOL): Quality of life and toxicity outcomes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background: While adjuvant 6-monthly zoledronate is widely used in patients with early-stage breast cancer (EBC), questions remain around optimal scheduling of adjuvant bisphosphonates. We reviewed quality of life and bisphosphonate-related toxicities observed within a prospective randomised trial. Methods: Patients with EBC were randomised to either a single infusion of adjuvant zoledronate (4mg IV) or to 6-monthly treatment for 3 years. Quality of life was measured using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire (before and after each infusion and 6-monthly thereafter in the single infusion arm). Acute phase reaction (APRs) data was collected after each infusion and data on other bisphosphonate-related toxicities (hypocalcaemia, renal impairment, ONJ and atypical fractures) was collected 6-monthly for 3 years. Results: Between 21-Nov-2018 and 02-Apr-2020, 211 patients were randomized to either a single infusion (n=107) or 6-monthly (n=104) adjuvant zoledronate. While each zoledronate infusion was associated with a worsening QoL, the overall QoL was the same in the two study arms. APRs occurred in 75% of patients after receiving zoledronate. Other bisphosphonate-related toxicities were uncommon in either arm. Significantly more patients discontinued study treatment in the 6-monthly arm (30/104, 28.8%) compared with the single infusion arm (3/107, 2.8%) (p < 0.001). The most common reason for study discontinuation was the occurrence of APRs, pain and malaise. Disease-free and overall survival rates were not significantly different in the study arms. Discussion: A single infusion of adjuvant zoledronate may offer patients a more convenient and better tolerate regimen than repeat infusions. APRs remain an important toxicity with repeat infusions of zoledronate, leading to increased rates of treatment discontinuation. Larger, definitive, trials comparing a single infusion with repeat treatments are required. Citation Format: Igor Machado, Lucas Clemons, Carol Stober, Gregory Pond, Arif Awan, Henry Conter, Demetrios Simos, Sukhbinder Dhesy-Thind, Mihaela Mates, Vikaash Kumar, John Hilton, Lisa Vandermeer, Mark Clemons. A randomised trial comparing 6-monthly dosing of adjuvant zoledronate with a single one-time dose in patients with early breast cancer (REaCT-ZOL): Quality of life and toxicity outcomes [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO4-13-01.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".