Circulating Metabolite Abundances Associated With Risks of Bipolar Disorder, Schizophrenia, and Depression: A Mendelian Randomization Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Preventive measures and treatments for psychiatric disorders are limited. Circulating metabolites are potential candidates for biomarker and therapeutic target identification, given their measurability and essential roles in biological processes. METHODS: Leveraging large-scale genome-wide association studies, we conducted Mendelian randomization analyses to assess the associations between circulating metabolite abundances and the risks of bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and depression. Genetic instruments were selected for 94 metabolites measured in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging cohort (N = 8299). We repeated Mendelian randomization analyses based on the UK Biobank, INTERVAL, and EPIC (European Prospective Investigation into Cancer)-Norfolk studies. RESULTS: After validating Mendelian randomization assumptions and colocalization evidence, we found that a 1 SD increase in genetically predicted circulating abundances of eicosapentaenoate and docosapentaenoate was associated with odds ratios of 0.72 (95% CI, 0.65-0.79) and 0.63 (95% CI, 0.55-0.72), respectively, for bipolar disorder. Genetically increased Ω-3 unsaturated fatty acids abundance and Ω-3-to-total fatty acids ratio, as well as genetically decreased Ω-6-to-Ω-3 ratio, were negatively associated with the risk of bipolar disorder in the UK Biobank. Genetically increased circulating abundances of 3 N-acetyl-amino acids were associated with an increased risk of schizophrenia with a maximum odds ratio of 1.31 (95% CI, 1.18-1.44) per 1 SD increase. Furthermore, a 1 SD increase in genetically predicted circulating abundance of hypotaurine was associated with an odds ratio of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.78-0.93) for depression. CONCLUSIONS: The biological mechanisms that underlie Ω-3 unsaturated fatty acids, NAT8-catalyzed N-acetyl-amino acids, and hypotaurine warrant exploration to identify new biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.014 | 0.027 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".