MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4396746795 · doi:10.3390/molecules29102200

Novel Combretastatin A-4 Analogs—Design, Synthesis, and Antiproliferative and Anti-Tubulin Activity

2024· article· en· W4396746795 on OpenAlexaff
Marta Jędrzejczyk, Benedetta Morabito, Barbara Żyżyńska‐Granica, Marta Struga, Jan Janczak, Maral Aminpour, Jack A. Tuszyński, Adam Huczyński

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecules · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSynthesis and biological activity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTubulinCombretastatinChemistrySulforhodamine BMicrotubuleStereochemistryColchicineIn vitroIn vivoCytotoxicityBiochemistryBiologyCell biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Combretastatins isolated from the Combretum caffrum tree belong to a group of closely related stilbenes. They are colchicine binding site inhibitors which disrupt the polymerization process of microtubules in tubulins, causing mitotic arrest. In vitro and in vivo studies have proven that some combretastatins exhibit antitumor properties, and among them, combretastatin A-4 is the most active mitotic inhibitor. In this study, a series of novel combretastatin A-4 analogs containing carboxylic acid, ester, and amide moieties were synthesized and their cytotoxic activity against six tumor cell lines was determined using sulforhodamine B assay. For the most cytotoxic compounds (8 and 20), further studies were performed. These compounds were shown to induce G0/G1 cell cycle arrest in MDA and A549 cells, in a concentration-dependent manner. Moreover, in vitro tubulin polymerization assays showed that both compounds are tubulin polymerization enhancers. Additionally, computational analysis of the binding modes and binding energies of the compounds with respect to the key human tubulin isotypes was performed. We have obtained a satisfactory correlation of the binding energies with the IC50 values when weighted averages of the binding energies accounting for the abundance of tubulin isotypes in specific cancer cell lines were computed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score0.632

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMoleculesSame topicSynthesis and biological activityFrench-language works237,207