MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4397007318 · doi:10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.103354

297P Modified Delphi consensus on interventions for radiation dermatitis in breast cancer: A Canadian expert perspective

2024· article· en· W4397007318 on OpenAlexaffabout
Tarek Hijal, Michael Yassa, Ericka Wiebe, J-M. Bourque, Hannah Dahn, Iwa Kong, Danielle Rodin, Ciudad Bolívar, J-M Caudrelier, S. Marchuk, Valérie Théberge, Edward Chow, Valérie Panet-Raymond, Philip Wright, Babar Bashir, Michael Sauder, Joël Claveau, Nour R. Dayeh, Jeffrey Cao

Bibliographic record

VenueESMO Open · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEffects of Radiation Exposure
Canadian institutionsHôtel-Dieu de QuébecUniversity Health NetworkCancerCare ManitobaOttawa HospitalHealth Sciences CentreUniversity of SaskatchewanCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalUniversité LavalPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreDalhousie UniversityUniversity of British ColumbiaHôpital Maisonneuve-RosemontSunnybrook Health Science CentreMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerspective (graphical)Psychological interventionDelphiBreast cancerDelphi methodMedicineDermatologyMedical physicsCancerComputer scienceInternal medicineArtificial intelligenceNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Acute radiation dermatitis is a prevalent adverse effect of radiotherapy in patients with breast cancer, and there is a lack of high-quality data regarding its prevention and management, which leads to a lack of standardized care This study employs a modified Delphi process to compile the perspectives of Canadian breast cancer radiation oncology and dermatology experts, aiming to establish consensus-based recommendations for the prevention and management of acute radiation dermatitis in breast cancer patients. A four-round modified Delphi consensus process was organised with the participation of 19 Canadian experts. The process involved a systematic review of existing literature on the prevention and treatment of acute radiation dermatitis in breast cancer, from January 1946 to July 2023. Participants then provided their opinions on the strength and quality of the evidence for the 59 identified interventions. A second round involved assessing the degree to which the intervention would be recommended in either low- or high-risk settings. Two other rounds were used to consolidate consensus, which was determined by achieving a minimum agreement threshold of 75%. With two rounds completed, consensus for recommendation was reached for 2 prevention interventions in both low- and high-risk settings and near-consensus for recommendation was reached for 1 prevention intervention in the high-risk setting. With regards to the management of acute radiation dermatitis, there was consensus for recommendation for 1 product. However, a significant number of interventions did not receive recommendations for either prevention or management due to insufficient or conflicting evidence. Two subsequent rounds are currently being held, and final recommendations are planned for the spring 2024. This pan-Canadian modified Delphi consensus initiative provides expert-reviewed and evidence-based recommendations for interventions to prevent and manage acute radiation dermatitis in breast cancer patients, highlighting areas where consensus among experts has been achieved, with the goal of standardising care and minimizing unnecessary costs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.820
Threshold uncertainty score0.489

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.348 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueESMO OpenSame topicEffects of Radiation ExposureFrench-language works237,207