MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4397040993 · doi:10.1681/asn.20233411s1603d

Unbiased Proteomics Analysis Shows Distinct Graft Protein Expression in Donor-Specific Antibodies (DSA+) Kidney Transplant Recipients with Antibody-Mediated Rejection

2023· article· en· W4397040993 on OpenAlexaff
Kieran Manion, Maya A. Allen, Sergi Clotet Freixas, Rohan John, Ana Konvalinka

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDonor specific antibodiesAntibodyProtein expressionKidneyProteomicsGraft rejectionMedicineKidney transplantationImmunologyBiologyTransplantationInternal medicineBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Nearly 1,000,000 North Americans have end-stage renal disease (ESRD), where the kidneys no longer function. Transplantation is the best treatment for ESRD; however, 50% of grafts fail by 10 years, due mainly to antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), where recipient donor-specific antibodies (DSA) are thought to drive tissue injury. Unfortunately, predicting ABMR onset is challenging, as 30-60% of DSA+ transplant patients do not develop ABMR. We aim to identify factors that regulate kidney protein expression in DSA+ kidney transplant recipients with and without ABMR. Methods: Glomeruli and tubulointerstitium isolated from DSA+ABMR (n=24) and DSA+ no ABMR (NA; n=21) kidney biopsies using laser capture microdissection were digested to peptides and analyzed by liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. MaxQuant and Perseus software were used to assess protein identification and differential expression. Significantly differentially expressed proteins (t-test, p<0.05) were then mapped to signaling pathways using the pathDIP database (FDR with Benjamini Hochberg adjustment, q<0.05). Results: 120 glomerular and 246 tubulointerstitial proteins were significantly differentially expressed between DSA+ABMR and DSA+NA patients, with 55% of these proteins upregulated in ABMR (Figure 1). pathDIP analysis showed that upregulated proteins mapped significantly to pathways involving the immune system (glomeruli, q=7.6e-8; tubulointerstitium, q=3.8e-11), antigen processing (glomeruli, q=5.6e-11) and integrin activity (tubulointerstitium, q=1.0e-8), while downregulated proteins mapped to tight junction regulation (glomeruli, q= 1.0e-3) and cellular metabolism (tubulointerstitium, q=1.8e-9).Fig1.: Differentially expressed (p<0.05) proteins in the glomeruli (left) and tubulointerstitium (right) of DSA+ kidney transplant recipients with vs without ABMR.Conclusions: Our preliminary results suggest that ABMR in DSA+ patients is strongly linked to dysregulated immune and cellular responses in multiple kidney tissues. These findings will ultimately help us identify novel targets for the development of therapeutics for kidney transplant recipients. Funding: Government Support - Non-U.S.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology→Same topicRenal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments→French-language works237,207→