A Natural History Study of Timothy Syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Timothy syndrome (OMIM #601005) is a rare disease caused by variants in the gene CACNA1C . Timothy syndrome patients were first identified as having a cardiac presentation of Long QT and syndactyly of the fingers and/or toes, and an identical variant in CACNA1C , Gly406Arg. However, since this original identification, more individuals harboring diverse variants in CACNA1C have been identified and have presented with various cardiac and extra-cardiac symptoms. Furthermore, it has remained underexplored whether individuals harboring canonical Gly406Arg variants in mutually exclusive exon 8A (Timothy syndrome 1) or exon 8 (Timothy syndrome 2) have additional symptoms. Here, we describe the first Natural History Study for Timothy syndrome, providing a thorough resource describing the current understanding of disease manifestation in Timothy syndrome patients. Parents of Timothy syndrome children were queried regarding a wide-ranging set of symptoms and features via a survey. Importantly, we find that in addition to cardiac concerns, Timothy syndrome patients commonly share extra-cardiac features including neurodevelopmental impairments, hypoglycemia, and respiratory problems. Our work expands the current understanding of the disorder to better inform the care of Timothy syndrome patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".